ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Grenfell Inquiry delayed by ‘immunity’ bid from corporate witnesses

The inquiry into the Grenfell Tower tragedy has been delayed while the panel decides whether evidence given by corporate witnesses could be used against them in any future criminal proceedings.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Jon Enoch
Picture: Jon Enoch
Sharelines

Grenfell inquiry delayed by 'immunity' bid from corporate witnesses #ukhousing

Inquiry panel are considering the application to the Attorney General #ukhousing

No more Grenfell Inquiry sessions this week while a legal application is considered #ukhousing

The inquiry wrote to participants on Tuesday informing them that there will be no further hearings this week while Sir Martin Moore-Bick and Thouria Istephan, who are overseeing the proceedings, consider the legal application.

Staff from architects Studio E, cladding sub-contractor Harley Facades, contractor Rydon, building firm Osborne Berry, and Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation were due to be cross-examined in the coming days, but submitted a last-minute legal bid to to the inquiry team.

He can provide an undertaking which would stop any evidence given by staff being used against them in future criminal proceedings, if Sir Martin and Ms Istephan allow the claim to go ahead.

Without it, some of the witnesses threatened to stay silent by claiming the legal right of privilege against self-incrimination.


READ MORE

Government ‘likely’ to have breached Human Rights Act over failure to overhaul regulations before fire, Grenfell Inquiry hearsGovernment ‘likely’ to have breached Human Rights Act over failure to overhaul regulations before fire, Grenfell Inquiry hears
Grenfell witnesses will not have evidence used against them in any future prosecutionGrenfell witnesses will not have evidence used against them in any future prosecution
KCTMO ‘not a passive bystander’ in Grenfell Tower refurbishment, inquiry hearsKCTMO ‘not a passive bystander’ in Grenfell Tower refurbishment, inquiry hears
The depressing finger-pointing at the Grenfell Tower Inquiry is a vindication for HackittThe depressing finger-pointing at the Grenfell Tower Inquiry is a vindication for Hackitt

Crimes against health and safety at work are punishable by up to two years in prison, but in the application the companies’ lawyers noted that a manslaughter charge could lead to a life sentence.

During Monday’s evidence session, Stephanie Barwise, who represents the larger of the two groups of victims affected by the disaster, said her clients had expressed “utter outrage” at the timing of the application.

“Our clients are profoundly upset and angry that the application is being made at all in circumstances where hitherto these participants have all claimed to be being co-operative, and therefore should not at this very late stage be seeking to protect themselves,” she said.

“The very fact of their application perhaps explains why the position and witness statements say so very little and do not truly engage with the real issues with which this inquiry is concerned.”

She also pointed out that firefighters involved in tackling the blaze in June 2017 were just as much at risk of future prosecution but had agreed to give evidence.

“The timing of this application appears disingenuous and an attempt at sabotage,” she added.

But Jonathan Laidlaw, the lawyer representing Harley Facades, said clarifying the legal position of witnesses would actually help the inquiry’s progress.

“We would suggest that the conclusion you should be driven to is in fact that the best interests of the public inquiry, and therefore of the public interest, lie in the mechanism of the undertaking of the sort we invite you to consider,” he said.

He added: “It is the undertaking which is most likely to lead to full and frank answers that the inquiry, through its counsel, have called for.”

Closing the session yesterday, Richard Millett, who is the leading counsel for the Grenfell Inquiry team, said he and his colleagues were “surprised and dismayed” by the timing of the request for the undertaking by the witnesses.

However, he argued that the purpose of the inquiry was to find out exactly what happened during the Grenfell Tower fire and that without the application being submitted the inquiry would not get the truth and have only a partial picture.

He concluded: “When you balance the factors in favour of seeking the undertaking with the factors against doing so and the answers to those factors, counsel to the inquiry’s submission is that the scales come down in favour of seeking the former in the public interest.”

He urged Sir Martin to impress the urgency of the request on the attorney general and try and ensure that the inquiry could resume as soon as possible to undo the “derailing” impact of the application.

Sign up for our weekly Grenfell Inquiry newsletter

Sign up for our weekly Grenfell Inquiry newsletter

Each week we send out a newsletter rounding up the key news from the Grenfell Inquiry, along with the headlines from the week

New to Inside Housing? Click here to register and receive the weekly newsletter straight to your inbox

Already have an account? Click here to manage your newsletters

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings