ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Pocket Living explores setting up for-profit that could help deliver larger sites

A developer specialising in small, sub-market rate homes is exploring setting up a for-profit provider of social housing, which it says could help it develop larger sites.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Pocket Living’s chief executive Marc Vlessing (picture: Jon Enoch)
Pocket Living’s chief executive Marc Vlessing (picture: Jon Enoch)
Sharelines

.@Pocket_Living explores setting up for-profit social housing provider #ukhousing

“If the landscape is becoming more complicated, should we also have our own RP within the mix?” asks @marcvlessing #ukhousing

Pocket Living, which builds “compact” flats for first-time buyers in London sold at 20% below market value, is researching the possibility of registering a subsidiary with the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH).

Marc Vlessing, chief executive of Pocket, told Inside Housing that while the company does not currently have any such projects in the pipeline, owning a registered provider (RP) of social housing may help it develop larger sites in the future.

Pocket would likely use a for-profit to bid for Section 106 deals on its larger developments, he said.


READ MORE

For-profit provider given access to Homes England grant fundingFor-profit provider given access to Homes England grant funding
Luxury hotel and property developer registers for-profit housing associationLuxury hotel and property developer registers for-profit housing association
The development that is 100% affordable housingThe development that is 100% affordable housing
When builders become landlordsWhen builders become landlords

He added: “The big revelation in thinking around housing in the last five to 10 years has been that between the open market on one hand and social housing on the other there is a whole range of housing need to be met.

“We are looking at the spectrum between those two extremes and asking ourselves more difficult questions than we had to when we set up 15 years ago as a market disruptor.

“If the landscape is becoming more complicated, should we also have our own RP within the mix?”

Several developers have registered for-profits with the RSH to deliver Section 106 agreements on their own schemes of late, meaning they will be able to retain the social housing they build.

Mr Vlessing said Pocket would be unlikely to bid for Section 106s on non-Pocket developments.

He indicated that any new subsidiary would likely bid for affordable housing grant, but not necessarily as a means of funding its typical model of homes.

Sign up for our development and finance newsletter

Sign up for our development and finance newsletter
Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings