Leaseholders in blocks with Grenfell-style cladding face crippling bills and the ever-present threat of a devastating fire. Our new campaign calls on the government to end this scandal. Peter Apps explains why it is necessary
On 19 May 2015, a devastating tower block fire in Baku, Azerbaijan, killed 15 people including five children. The fire was linked to new combustible insulation installed on the outside of many Soviet-era buildings in the city during a period of ‘beautification’.
In the aftermath, frustrated by the lack of action from the state, residents of similar blocks quite literally took matters into their own hands – removing the cladding with hammers or even tearing it off with their fingers.
We have not yet reached that stage in the UK, but it is no exaggeration to say it cannot be that far away. Of the 434 high-rise buildings known to have Grenfell-style cladding, safety work is complete on just 89 nearly two years on from the nightmare fire in west London.
The problem is most acute in private residential buildings. Of the 178 identified to have dangerous cladding since Grenfell, remediation work is complete on just 10. Unlike in the social housing sector there is no government money available to support this work and no state-led programme to ensure it is completed swiftly and properly.
This week, Inside Housing is joining the residents of these blocks to say enough is enough. The government simply must take control of the situation. However Treasury officials feel about it, a big part of that is providing the necessary money to get this work done.
Our campaign has three simple asks (see box).
First, a fund must be established to pay for the necessary works – both external and internal – to make buildings safe. Second, a clear timetable of no more than two years must be set out for the work to be complete. Third, those leaseholders who have had to burn through life savings to pay for fire wardens and other interim measures must be recompensed.
It is regrettable to reach the position where the taxpayer is asked to fund this work but it is the only solution. Asking leaseholders – many of whom have received government support to buy their homes – to pay is not only unfair, it will also achieve little. These bills, upwards of £80,000 in the worst cases, cannot be paid in full. Residents will be rendered bankrupt and the work still will not be done.
Asking building owners or developers to pay may feel like a better solution, but the plain fact is that it has not worked. While some big builders have been strong-armed into pledging to pay, others have not reacted to public shaming. Some of the building owners are little more than offshore vehicles for owning property and do not fear tough speeches from the secretary of state. In other places, the blocks are owned by residents through Right to Manage companies.
Please email email@example.com if you want to support the campaign
Part of the problem is that our current system of leasehold law stacks the cards against leaseholders and the building owners know this. Every tribunal so far has found against the leaseholders – even down to awarding legal costs against them in some cases. The law is not on the side of justice.
The government attempted to up the ante before Christmas by introducing new rules giving local authorities the power to serve enforcement notices for the work to be carried out. But this was ill-considered and has back-fired: it contains no measure to prevent costs being passed to leaseholders and has in some instances simply put a hard deadline on negotiations about who should pay and seen leaseholders served with invoices.
In the instances where funding is in place, there are concerns about the lack of urgency. At New Capital Quay in south-east London, the National House Building Council (NHBC) accepted a claim to pay for the work in July last year. But a planning application was not submitted by developer Galliard until December. No timescale has been set, but residents fear it could take up to six years. That does not match the urgency of the situation.
64.8% of residents say their mental health has been "hugely affected" by the ongoing crisis in their blocks
77.8% have experienced anxiety as a direct result of the crisis, while 23% have experienced depression and 65.8% have had difficulty sleeping
8.7% have experienced suicidal thoughts as a direct result of the cladding issues
66.3% have been told by surveyors that they cannot sell the properties
28.1% have been diagnosed with a health issue by a medical professional
86.2% have seen service charges go up, with 25% saying more than £200,000 has been spent on their blocks
25% feel they cannot start a family as a result of the issues
Source: UKCAG survey of 196 affected leaseholders and tenants in private blocks affected by cladding issues
We must remember that when we say leaseholders, we are often talking about first-time buyers and families – some of whom will have received direct government support through the Help to Buy scheme. The homes they cobbled together their life savings to buy are almost worthless while the cladding remains on the outside, so they simply cannot afford to move.
As we reveal this week, the mental health implications of this ongoing impasse are severe (see box, above). That alone would be enough reason to act promptly.
But the bigger fear must be the threat of another disaster. Residential fires are an inevitability in these buildings. The vast majority of them are not fitted with sprinklers and many have inadequate passive fire protection. A cladding fire could be catastrophic. After Grenfell, the sector, the government and this magazine united in saying Never Again. If we truly meant it, we must take the plight of private buildings seriously.
There is little time to waste and that is why we are calling on the government to make the announcement before the second anniversary of Grenfell – now just seven weeks away. Leaseholders have waited long enough. They should not have to wait until the next disaster.
This list will be updated. Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you want to support the campaign
Click the links below to download images to use on social media (like the one above) to promote End Our Cladding Scandal
Note: If your browser does not allow you to download the image, simply right click on the graphic and click ‘save image as’ instead.