ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Grenfell Inquiry day 24: decision to abandon stay put policy explained

The decision-making which led to the abandonment of the stay put policy was explored in today’s evidence session.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

Grenfell Inquiry day 24: decision to abandon stay put policy explained #ukhousing

Key points

  • Senior fire officer says images he saw on Sky News helped the decision to abandon the stay put advice – but the TV was not on in the main control room
  • Crews being unable to get to above the 15th floor and huge volumes of calls coming from Grenfell Tower residents also added to the decision
  • “I was very surprised to see the external envelope of the building and the amount that was alight – I’ve never in my career seen a fire travel or move that fast around around the external envelope of a building,” senior officer Adrian Fenton told the inquiry

READ MORE

Grenfell Inquiry day 38: firefighters issue apologies to familiesGrenfell Inquiry day 38: firefighters issue apologies to families
NHBC accepts claim for Grenfell-style cladding removal from private developmentNHBC accepts claim for Grenfell-style cladding removal from private development
Stay put advice helped save lives at Grenfell, inquiry hearsStay put advice helped save lives at Grenfell, inquiry hears
The sector needs to realise it created the client culture that led to GrenfellThe sector needs to realise it created the client culture that led to Grenfell

More light was shed today on the decision to abandon stay put advice to Grenfell Tower residents as the fire spread.

The policy to tell people to stay in their flats was changed at around 2.30am, a couple of hours after the fire was first reported.

The inquiry heard yesterday that a television was not on in the main control centre overseeing the fire brigade’s operation.

However, we learned today that TV images of the blazing tower did contribute in helping Adrian Fenton, deputy assistant commissioner at the London Fire Brigade (LFB), decide to tell residents to escape the building.

He told the inquiry the fact that fire crews could not reach beyond the 15th floor and the sheer volumes of phone calls coming in from residents also influenced the decision, which he took along with senior operations manager Joanne Smith.

Mr Fenton was pushed by inquiry QC Richard Millett on whether the TV images he saw in a separate room of the control centre were the deciding factor.

Mr Millett asked: “Did seeing it on the TV make the difference?”

Mr Fenton replied: “For me to have that pictorial view, yes.”

Earlier in the inquiry, it emerged that Ms Smith had banned having the TV on in the main control centre as she was concerned it would be stressful to staff taking calls. Mr Fenton confirmed this in his written evidence.

“Joanne Smith said she didn’t want it on due to the stress with all the FSG [fire survival guidance] calls and did not want it distracting her staff,” he stated in his his evidence. “I went with that decision.”

Mr Fenton admitted that he was surprised at the way the fire had spread.

“I was very surprised to see the external envelope of the building and the amount that was alight. I’ve never in my career seen a fire travel or move that fast around around the external envelope of a building,” he told the inquiry.

Mr Fenton, who has had a 24-year career with the LFB, admitted that the amount of information and phone calls coming into the control room in Stratford was “relentless”.

He made the decision to set up white boards in the corner of the control room containing details of the people in each flat as the information came in.

“There was potential for the control staff to become overwhelmed,” he told the inquiry.

The room today was shown images of the white boards, bringing home the reality of who was in the blazing tower at the time.

Mr Fenton led what the LFB calls a Brigade Co-ordination Centre. Mr Fenton said once 25 pumps had been called out to Grenfell he knew a relief plan was needed “to make sure we have strategic cover”.

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

Closing statements

 

Day 85: victims' lawyers attack the fire brigade

 

Further expert evidence

Including some additional evidence from emergency call handlers, bereaved and relatives

 

Day 84: further evidence from survivors and relatives

Day 83: swift evacuation of tower possible if residents alerted

Day 82: initial fire was extinguished but then returned to the flat

Day 81: overheating fridge-freezer most likely cause of fire

Day 80: fire doors installed did not match product tested

Day 79: resident advised to stay put despite fire in flat

Day 78: insulation and cladding material below required standard

Day 77: molten plastic spread blaze down tower

Day 76: 'stay put' should be dropped when fire spreads across floors

 

Other witness evidence

Police, ambulance, gas suppliers, council, TMO and call room operators give evidence

 

Day 75: call room operators give evidence

Day 74: further evidence from TMO officers

Day 73: TMO boss failed to pass information to firefighters

Day 72: fire finally extinguished when gas switched off

Day 71: further questions over stay put advice

Day 70: the police evidence

 

The bereaved, survivors and relatives’ evidence

 

Day 69: video shows smoke billowing through fire door

Day 68: KCTMO removed self closing mechanism and never replaced it

Day 67: gaps in cladding fixed with duct tape

Day 66: 'don't fix broken system with a sticking plaster'

Day 65: survivor dragged disabled man down nine floors to safety

Day 64: KCTMO 'did not replace broken fire door'

Day 63: foam insulation inside cladding 'exposed' says survivor

Day 62: father gives harrowing account of son's death

Day 61: council’s management organisation slammed for faulty electrics

Day 60: stay put advice ‘led to deaths’, residents say

Day 59: residents describe problems with new windows

Day 58: survivor describes how daughter saved his life

Day 57: firefighter evidence ‘a slap in the face’, says survivor

Day 56: relations with contractor were ‘toxic’

Day 55: resident 'never happy' with stay-put advice

Day 54: tenant gives evidence about housing association

Day 53: stay put advice 'felt like trap'

Day 52: resident saved by son's phone call

 

The firefighters’ evidence

 

Day 51: firefighter feared encouraging residents to jump

Day 50: the LFB commissioner

Day 49: fire chief reveals frustration over lack of building plans

Day 48: internal fire spread 'bigger story' than cladding

Day 47: fire officer considered evacuating crews over building collapse fears

Day 46: 'we were improvising' senior firefighter admits

Day 45: firefighter urged for abandonment of 'stay put' policy

Day 44: firefighter recalls radio signal difficulties

Day 43: call hander 'uncomfortable' with insisting residents stay put

Day 42: residents only told to leave if they called fire brigade back

Day 41: breathing equipment delay 'hampered rescues on upper floors'

Day 40: chiefs told firefighters to abandon policy

Day 39: firefighters reveal dramatic rescue of children

Day 38: firefighters issue aplogies to families

Day 37: council 'unable to provide tower plans'

Day 36: QC defends inquiry process

Day 35: Javid would welcome interim recommendations

Day 34: water from hose 'too weak' to reach the flames

Day 33: 'oh my god, we've been telling people to stay put'

Day 32: further fire fighter describes lack of equipment and low water pressure

Day 31: 'incredibly difficult' task of recording information outlined

Day 30: struggle to maintain control over rescue operation described

Day 29: fire service 'overwhelmed' by survival guidance calls

Day 28: 'the building beat us'

Day 27: firefighters 'forced to abandon plans to reach roof'

Day 26: poor signage hindered rescue efforts

Day 25: water pressure left firefighting equipment 'like garden hose'

Day 24: decision to abandon 'stay put' explored

Day 23: TV images 'could have assissted' rescue effort

Day 22: description of hectic scenes in the control centre

Day 21: account from the fire service 'nerve centre'

Day 20: firefighter describes 'huge volume' of calls from trapped residents

Day 19: firefighter 'given no training on cladding fires'

Day 18: evacuation would have been 'huge catastrophe'

Day 17: firefighters describe access and lift issues

Day 16: scenes of carnage likened to 9/11

Day 15: firefighters recount trauma of survival guidance calls

Day 14: firefighters describe spread of blaze

Day 13: firefighters recall radio difficulties

Day 12: "it was like a war zone"

Day 11: questions raised over fire fighters' radios

Day 10: watch manager emotional under questioning

Day nine: lead firefighter 'not trained in stay put policy'

 

The expert reports: authors give evidence to inquiry

 

Day eight: where the fire started

Day seven: what was in the cladding?

Day six: the cause and spread of the fire

Day five: expert highlights key issues

Day four: firefighters defend response to fire

Day three: council and contractors appear for the first time

Day two: lawyers for the survivors make their case

Day one: expert evidence released on cladding and stay put

 

The commemoration hearings

 

30 May: Grenfell Council 'recognised it should not house disabled victim above four storeys'

29 May: Anger on day six of the Grenfell Inquiry

25 May: Grenfell families 'forced to live in chimney with stay put policy'

24 May: Grenfell family complained about father being housed on 17th floor

23 May: Tributes to children on third day of Grenfell hearings

22 May: Emotions run high as Grenfell bereaved shown footage of the tower burning

21 May: Grenfell victims share tributes as inquiry opens

 

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.