ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Housing association residents ‘felt pressured’ to return to homes after Barking fire

Social housing residents living next to the block that was partially destroyed by a fire in 2019 claimed they felt pressured by their landlord to return home despite raising safety fears, a new report has said.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
A fire broke out at Samuel Garside in June 2019 and all residents were evacuated (picture: Nathaniel Barker)
A fire broke out at Samuel Garside in June 2019 and all residents were evacuated (picture: Nathaniel Barker)
Sharelines

Housing association tenants say they were pressured into returning to their homes despite safety concerns after Barking Fire #UKhousing

A report commissioned by the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (LBBD) looking into the blaze found that Southern Housing residents said they were pressured to return to their homes despite wooden panels remaining on the outside of the building and an issue with the alarm system which had not been addressed.

The east London fire in June 2019 led to the evacuation of all residents from the Samuel Garside development at Barking Riverside and resulted in a number of flats being partially or heavily damaged.

Two people were treated for smoke inhalation, but there were no fatalities.

Wooden panelling fuelled the fire and caused it to spread across the building within minutes.

A previous report into the incident by the London Fire Bridge (LFB) found that the combination of timber cladding and plastic mesh on the blocks balconies posed a significant risk to life.

Read Inside Housing’s five key takeaways from the Barking Fire review

The Samuel Garside part of the development was made up of four adjoining blocks. Blocks C and D were for private leaseholders, while Southern was the landlord for 32 homes in blocks A and B. None of Southern’s homes were damaged by the fire.


READ MORE

Barking fire: the inside storyBarking fire: the inside story
Council launches fire safety review following Barking fireCouncil launches fire safety review following Barking fire
Government ‘names and shames’ 14 companies yet to start Grenfell-style cladding removal workGovernment ‘names and shames’ 14 companies yet to start Grenfell-style cladding removal work
Leaked Barking fire report reveals ‘significant risk to life’ from blazeLeaked Barking fire report reveals ‘significant risk to life’ from blaze

The review, which has been published today, said that most residents praised Southern’s response in the immediate aftermath of the fire, calling them professional and helpful. The landlord had more than 11 staff members at the emergency centre on the night of the fire, compared with just one from private building manager RMG.

The review notes that Southern was quick to set up emergency hotel accommodation for their tenants and were able to house all of their tenants on the night of the fire.

However, a number of residents interviewed for the review said that they were uncomfortable with how early Southern wanted to move residents back into their apartments. In one example, a resident said the association tried to move her back into her home within three days of the fire, despite safety concerns.

In the end she had to instruct a solicitor, working pro bono, to tell Southern she would not return. This resident spent time in hotels before being moved into temporary accommodation in September.

Another interviewee said she felt forced to return despite not feeling safe. Although she was offered alternative accommodation, she said this was at a higher rent that she could not afford and as a result felt she had no choice but to move back in.

The review, which was authored by former Lewisham mayor Steve Bullock and Diarmaid Ward, cabinet member for housing at Islington Council, looked into the events of the fire and the response from authorities and stakeholders including the building managers.

The review paints a picture of confusion after the fire, particularly for private leaseholders in the block. The report said that complex ownership structures of the private blocks meant it was hard for residents to access information and caused a lot of stress during the rehousing efforts.

As part of the report, the authors made a number of recommendations to be implemented, including a requirement for freeholders to lodge a statement of ownership with the Land Registry which sets out who holds the head leases for the properties and who owns the building.

It also suggested that this should be accompanied by a statement of responsibilities which residents receive annually and lays out clearly which organisation is responsible for what, including in the event of an emergency such as a fire, and include contacts for different stakeholders.

The report called for councils to have more powers in emergencies such as this, including the power to declare a ‘local housing emergency’ situation, which gives them the opportunity to take what they see is necessary action to support residents and reclaim costs from the building owners. This came after LBBD had to step in support residents at a number of points during the Barking fire recovery, despite it not necessarily being their role.

Suzanne Horsley, director of building safety at Southern, said: “We are pleased that the report recognises the work of our dedicated colleagues in quickly ensuring that our residents were properly supported from the moment of evacuation. We know how difficult the decision to return to homes in Barking Riverside has been for some, even with the LFB’s assurance that it was safe to do so.

“As an organisation, the safety and well-being of our residents is our highest priority. While it would not be appropriate for us to comment on the individual circumstances, we have continued to work closely with all affected residents to reassure them and support their individual needs.

“This includes offers of permanent alternative accommodation for anyone who did not wish to return for any reason, offering all affected residents a range of options based on their circumstances and the available housing stock.”

Sign up for our fire safety newsletter

Sign up for our fire safety newsletter
Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings