ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Legal challenge to be launched over ‘unlawful’ permitted development rights expansion

A campaign group has written to the government expressing its intention to seek a judicial review on the expansion of controversial permitted development rights.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Newbury House in Redbridge, a former office building repurposed into flats (picture: Sonny Dhamu)
Newbury House in Redbridge, a former office building repurposed into flats (picture: Sonny Dhamu)
Sharelines

Legal challenge launched on “unlawful” permitted development rights expansion #UKhousing

“The secretary of state did not adequately consider the impact [of permitted development] of these reforms on the disabled,” says @RightsClimate #UKhousing

@LeighDay_Law and @Landmark_LC demand “urgent response” to permitted development challenge before Monday #UKhousing

Rights: Community: Action (RCA) has sent a “pre-action protocol” letter via law firm Leigh Day challenging the lawfulness of the extension of permitted development rights and called for an urgent response ahead of the changes which are set to come in on 31 August.

Permitted development rights allow commercial and office buildings to be converted into housing without the need for planning permission. Prime minister Boris Johnson announced an extension of the policy, which critics say will lead to low-quality housing, in July as part of his ‘Project Speed’ agenda.

The letter noted that the reforms were laid before parliament the day before it went into recess on 21 July and “parliament has therefore had no opportunity to debate ‘the most radical reforms to our planning system since the Second World War’” before they come into effect. The group said that these changes could have “potentially enormous consequences for the environment”.


READ MORE

Permitted development wrongs: the problems with the PM’s planning deregulation drivePermitted development wrongs: the problems with the PM’s planning deregulation drive
The expansion of permitted development is outrageous, but it has increased support for genuinely radical changeThe expansion of permitted development is outrageous, but it has increased support for genuinely radical change
Warnings over quality and affordable housing cuts as Johnson unveils ‘Project Speed’ planWarnings over quality and affordable housing cuts as Johnson unveils ‘Project Speed’ plan
Why is the government going against its own evidence on permitted development?Why is the government going against its own evidence on permitted development?

“If they are not withdrawn or suspended, the claimant will challenge the lawfulness of these statutory instruments,” the letter added.

RCA is seeking a challenge based on an EU directive which says that a strategic environmental assessment is required for all plans and programmes likely to have significant environmental effects.

Another ground for the legal challenge is the lack of equality impact assessment with RCA arguing “the secretary of state did not adequately consider the impact of these reforms on the disabled”.

The group also challenged the reforms on the grounds that the government has failed to take into account its own expert advice on permitted developments.

This is in reference to a government-commissioned report which found permitted development delivers lower quality residential properties than planning permission conversions. The report, produced by Dr Ben Clifford at University College London, was published on the same day the government announced the reforms.

Speaking to Inside Housing after the publication of the report, Mr Clifford accused ministers of deliberately “ignoring the evidence” about permitted development rights.

Paul Brown QC and Alex Shattock of Landmark Chambers have also been appointed by RCA.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: “The government has received the letter and will respond in due course.”

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings