ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Major building control company no longer accepts desktop studies

The National House Building Council (NHBC) has stopped accepting a controversial means of clearing cladding for use on buildings.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

Building control officers no longer accepting desktop studies #ukhousing

In response to the Grenfell Tower fire NHBC, which says it carries out building control services for 80% of new homes built, has changed its policy to stop accepting so-called ‘desktop studies’ for cladding.

A desktop study allows a manufacturer to take data from previous tests on cladding and use those results to make a judgement on how a new untested cladding system would react to fire.

These have been called into question since the Grenfell Tower fire, with a spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government telling Inside Housing there had been “inappropriate and irresponsible use of these studies”.


READ MORE

Government considers banning desktop studiesGovernment considers banning desktop studies
Government submission to EU does not include desktop studies ban for fire safety testingGovernment submission to EU does not include desktop studies ban for fire safety testing
Housing select committee calls for ban on desktop studiesHousing select committee calls for ban on desktop studies
Method of signing off cladding without fire safety testing could increase under government planMethod of signing off cladding without fire safety testing could increase under government plan

Neil Jefferson, chief operating officer at the NHBC, told Inside Housing: “At the moment, I think most leading building control companies are only accepting option one and option two [non-combustible cladding or a full-scale test]. We’ve led that and we’ve done the same thing. So that has changed.”

He added that while previous desktop studies are “not now unacceptable”, there has been an “acceptance that things needed to change.”

The NHBC is an ‘approved inspector’ – a private building control company introduced by Margaret Thatcher in 1985 to compete with local authorities.

Though their role has been greatly diminished by privatisation, local authorities still carry out some building control work.

Paul Everall, chief executive of Local Authority Building Control, told Inside Housing: “There is a current government consultation on the use of desktop studies in relation to cladding. We have not issued any advice to our members on their use in advance of the outcome of that consultation.

“In the light of Grenfell, all of our members are of course aware of the need to study very carefully any building control application which comes before them relying on desktop studies in support of the cladding material proposed, and to ensure that what is said does not extrapolate beyond the limits of the tests referred to.”

The government has said it is consulting on whether desktop studies should be banned completely.

Its submission to the European Commission for this consultation, however, makes no mention of the possibility of a ban.

What are desktop studies, and why are people concerned?

Building regulations say cladding systems which contain combustible insulation must be shown to meet specific standards based on “full scale test data”

A ‘desktop study’ is a means of making an assumption about whether or not a cladding system would meet these standards without actually testing it.

It involves using data from previous tests of the materials in different combinations to make assumptions about how it would perform in a test.

This is not specifically provided for in the current guide to building regulations, but the government believes they are loosely drafted to an extent which makes it permissible. It plans to redraft the guidance to include specific rules on the use of desktop studies for the first time.

The alternatives to a desktop study are full scale testing or not using combustible materials.

People are concerned about the process because it is based on assumption: at least one system cleared through a desktop study has failed a full scale test.

This is important for fire safety because mistakes may mean unsafe cladding systems being cleared for use on tall buildings.

The Paper Trail: The Failure of Building Regulations

Read our in-depth investigation into how building regulations have changed over time and how this may have contributed to the Grenfell Tower fire:

Never Again campaign

Never Again campaign

Inside Housing has launched a campaign to improve fire safety following the Grenfell Tower fire

Never Again: campaign asks

Inside Housing is calling for immediate action to implement the learning from the Lakanal House fire, and a commitment to act – without delay – on learning from the Grenfell Tower tragedy as it becomes available.

LANDLORDS

  • Take immediate action to check cladding and external panels on tower blocks and take prompt, appropriate action to remedy any problems
  • Update risk assessments using an appropriate, qualified expert.
  • Commit to renewing assessments annually and after major repair or cladding work is carried out
  • Review and update evacuation policies and ‘stay put’ advice in light of risk assessments, and communicate clearly to residents

GOVERNMENT

  • Provide urgent advice on the installation and upkeep of external insulation
  • Update and clarify building regulations immediately – with a commitment to update if additional learning emerges at a later date from the Grenfell inquiry
  • Fund the retrofitting of sprinkler systems in all tower blocks across the UK (except where there are specific structural reasons not to do so)

We will submit evidence from our research to the Grenfell public inquiry.

The inquiry should look at why opportunities to implement learning that could have prevented the fire were missed, in order to ensure similar opportunities are acted on in the future.

 

READ MORE ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN HERE

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.