You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles
Influential thinktank Policy Exchange has said beauty should be mandated as part of the planning process for new housing.
In a report entitled Building Beautiful Places, the right-wing thinktank Policy Exchange recommended that the government define national criteria for “beautiful places”, so that design has a more prominent role in planning.
The report also said local planning authorities should have the option of setting their own standards. Whichever criteria are used, they would then be part of the planning process, with the developer being obliged to fulfil them.
Housing secretary James Brokenshire welcomed the report in its foreword, but did not endorse any of its specific proposals.
The report’s nine suggested criteria for beautiful places were:
Local plans already require developers to meet certain design standards, but the report criticised some of these for being too vague and not setting precise benchmarks.
For example, Southampton City Council was singled out for stating in its local plan: “New development should be designed to improve legibility and local identity by enhancing and complementing the positive visual characteristics of the city and its wider regional area.”
Conversely, the report praised other councils for outlining specific aims, such as Wiltshire Council’s policy that developments should provide six acres of public open space per 1,000 residents.
The report did not recommend any benchmarks for its nine criteria, instead saying they should be determined by public consultation.
Policy Exchange exerted a major influence over housing policy during David Cameron’s tenure as prime minister, with its former head of housing, planning and urban policy Alex Morton being appointed to Mr Cameron’s top team in 2015.
Theresa May later abandoned many of the policies subsequently adopted by Mr Cameron. But the frontrunner to be the next prime minister, Boris Johnson, endorsed a Policy Exchange report on housing policy last month.