ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

MPs call on government to take responsibility for leaseholder cladding costs

A cross-party group of MPs has called on the government to intervene in tower blocks where leaseholders face huge bills to remove dangerous cladding.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

Cross-party MPs call on government to take responsibility for leaseholder cladding costs #ukhousing

Freeholders should stop “hiding behind offshore entities”, says Conservative MP #ukhousing

Leaseholders across the country face huge bills for dangerous cladding #ukhousing

In a parliamentary debate this afternoon, several Conservative MPs spoke alongside Labour and Scottish National Party colleagues calling on the government to take responsibility for the costs of removing cladding from private tower blocks.

In blocks across the country, leaseholders face having to pay for cladding that has failed the government’s fire safety tests to be removed and replaced.

Robert Neill, Conservative MP for Bromley and Chislehurst, said leaseholders in his constituency are “forking out in the region of £6,000-odd a month” for a waking watch in their block.

He added: “If there was a failure of regulation, whoever was the government at the time, it’s a failure of governance and then ultimately I would suggest that government needs to stand behind this, rather than expecting that to be picked up by individuals who have done nothing whatsoever and have no control whatsoever over what has happened.”


READ MORE

Government fire expert signed certificate for Grenfell-style claddingGovernment fire expert signed certificate for Grenfell-style cladding
Manager of block with Grenfell-style cladding launches legal claim against NHBCManager of block with Grenfell-style cladding launches legal claim against NHBC
Sector calls for government action over cladding delaysSector calls for government action over cladding delays
What do the leaked Kingspan meeting notes show?What do the leaked Kingspan meeting notes show?

Housing secretary Sajid Javid has said freeholders have a “moral responsibility” not to let leaseholders cover the cost of removing and replacing cladding.

Dan Poulter, Conservative MP for Central Suffolk and North Ipswich, said: “Moral responsibility is not going to work and there’s got to be legislation from the government that’s needed to sort this problem out.”

Sir Peter Bottomley, Conservative MP for Worthing West, said freeholders of private blocks where cladding is unsafe should come forward and stop “hiding behind offshore entities”.

Steve Reed, Labour MP for Croydon North, who called the debate, said it is the government’s responsibility to remove the cladding on these blocks “because it’s the government’s flawed regulatory system that allowed it to go up in the first place”.

Responding to the debate, housing minister Dominic Raab said the government has been working with councils to find out which private buildings have similar cladding to Grenfell Tower and has tasked Dame Judith Hackitt with carrying out a review into building regulations and fire safety.

He said: “The suggestion that we’re somehow sitting on our hands… is quite wrong and I think the reaction to the Dame Judith review shows that.”

He added: “Just for the record, just as a matter of balance in this debate, it is right to point out that the shadow housing secretary, when he was the housing minister, actually refused extra funding for fire safety measures because he didn’t deem them necessary.

“I’m not saying this to score any political points – I’m making the argument that any honourable member in the position of a minister would look at this carefully, responsibly and take the expert advice. That’s what the honourable gentleman did, that’s what we have done.”

Mr Raab said the government believes it has identified all the social housing blocks and public buildings with unsafe cladding.

On the removal of cladding Mr Raab said the government has been “very clear that this should be done as swiftly as possible, but it must be done properly”.

He added: “Let’s be clear, the remediation of buildings with aluminium composite material cladding is a complex process; it involves major construction work which needs to be planned, consulted on and carried out professionally and carefully.

“Planning alone can take up to a year. It’s not just a case of ripping down the cladding then deciding what to do next.”

He said the “allocation of the responsibility” for who pays the cladding costs in private blocks “depends on the terms of the leasehold arrangements”.

He added: “Where building owners are seeking to pass on remediation costs to leaseholders, it’s important [leaseholders are] able to get specialist advice.”

Never Again campaign

Never Again campaign

Inside Housing has launched a campaign to improve fire safety following the Grenfell Tower fire

Never Again: campaign asks

Inside Housing is calling for immediate action to implement the learning from the Lakanal House fire, and a commitment to act – without delay – on learning from the Grenfell Tower tragedy as it becomes available.

LANDLORDS

  • Take immediate action to check cladding and external panels on tower blocks and take prompt, appropriate action to remedy any problems
  • Update risk assessments using an appropriate, qualified expert.
  • Commit to renewing assessments annually and after major repair or cladding work is carried out
  • Review and update evacuation policies and ‘stay put’ advice in light of risk assessments, and communicate clearly to residents

GOVERNMENT

  • Provide urgent advice on the installation and upkeep of external insulation
  • Update and clarify building regulations immediately – with a commitment to update if additional learning emerges at a later date from the Grenfell inquiry
  • Fund the retrofitting of sprinkler systems in all tower blocks across the UK (except where there are specific structural reasons not to do so)

We will submit evidence from our research to the Grenfell public inquiry.

The inquiry should look at why opportunities to implement learning that could have prevented the fire were missed, in order to ensure similar opportunities are acted on in the future.

 

READ MORE ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN HERE

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.