ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Analysis reveals landlords slowest to comply with Housing Ombudsman orders

Councils made up the five landlords with the worst record on complying with orders issued by the Housing Ombudsman within three months last year, Inside Housing can reveal.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Eight out of 10 landlords with the highest maladministration rate are based in London (picture: Getty)
Eight out of 10 landlords with the highest maladministration rate are based in London (picture: Getty)
Sharelines

Councils made up the five landlords with the worst record on complying with orders issued by @HousingOmbuds within three months last year, Inside Housing can reveal #UKhousing

Extensive analysis of landlord performance reports published by the complaints arbitration service also reveals that eight of the 10 social housing providers with the highest ‘maladministration rate’ following ombudsman investigations are based in London.

In December, the Housing Ombudsman released data sheets on every landlord in its scheme for the first time, as part of a drive towards greater transparency.

The reports include figures on landlords’ performance in complying with orders served to them by the ombudsman following its investigations.

They provide data on the percentage of orders completed within three and six months of the target date set by the service.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL IN-DEPTH ARTICLE

Inside Housing’s research has identified that Manchester City Council, which owns nearly 16,000 homes, had the worst record in the sector in 2019/20 – it only complied with 20% of orders inside of three months and complied with 80% inside of six months.

Dacorum Borough Council, Newham Council, St Albans Council and District Council and Corby Borough Council, in that order, were the other landlords which performed worst at complying with orders inside of three months.


READ MORE

Housing association forced to pay compensation to family after Housing Ombudsman investigationHousing association forced to pay compensation to family after Housing Ombudsman investigation
Housing Ombudsman concerned over ‘weak’ heating and hot water contractsHousing Ombudsman concerned over ‘weak’ heating and hot water contracts
Housing Ombudsman to set up new resident panelHousing Ombudsman to set up new resident panel

Newham Council tied with Manchester for the lowest percentage of order complied with after six months at 80%.

Gateway Housing Association, North Tyneside Council and Origin Housing, in that order, made up the other landlords among the five with the lowest percentage for this metric, according to the performance reports.

North Tyneside Council is disputing its figures with the ombudsman.

Redbridge Council had the highest maladministration rate of any social landlord in England; it was subject to at least five investigations by the ombudsman in 2019/20.

In total, the ombudsman upheld residents’ complaints in 86% of cases following a formal probe.

Shepherds Bush Housing Group (SBHG) had the second highest maladministration rate with 83%, while Gateway was third with 80%.

The ombudsman’s publication of its landlord performance reports follows Inside Housing devising its own complaints failures index for nearly 300 social housing providers in England last October.

Manchester City Council, Newham Council or Redbridge Council did not respond to a request for comment in time to be included in this article.

Dacorum Council said the data “relates to one element of one case” where it paid compensation “immediately”.

However, it was “unable to reach a resolution with the complainant on the final element of the order relating to claim for costs”, with the tenant deciding to take legal action.

Corby Council said it has now implemented a new complaints procedure, training for customer service staff and a better customer satisfaction framework, meaning it is “now 100% compliant with these orders and… committed to remaining at such standards”.

Gateway has also changed procedures “to ensure compliance within target”, while also “having worked with resident groups and implemented their recommendations on complaints handling”.

A spokesperson for Origin said: “In one case we are sorry not to have met the timescale set by the ombudsman and we have tightened up our processes to make sure that it doesn’t happen again.”

North Tyneside Council said it believed it had complied with all orders in time and has asked the ombudsman to investigate a case which “may have been wrongly recorded as a late compliance because there was a 12-month delay in having that confirmed by the ombudsman”.

Matt Campion, chief executive of SBHG, said: “Customer satisfaction is one of our most important business priorities and we have set ourselves tough corporate objectives for improving this.

“We are making progress on this journey, but recognise that sometimes our services have not been good enough and that residents have had cause for complaint.”

He added: “We have seen a substantial reduction in residents making complaints to the ombudsman with five referrals having been made this year.”

St Albans Council declined to comment.

Sign up for our daily newsletter

Sign up for our daily newsletter
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings