ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Council hits back at MP over Grenfell rehousing strategy criticism

Kensington and Chelsea Council has called a letter from the local MP criticising its rehousing policy “unhelpful to tenants who are trying to rebuild their lives”.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Sharelines

Kensington Council has hit back in a row with the local MP over its rehousing policy for residents affected by the Grenfell Tower fire #ukhousing

In a letter – seen by Inside Housing – to Emma Dent Coad, the MP for Kensington, Kim Taylor-Smith, deputy leader of the council, accused her of “misappropriation of our intention behind the Wider Grenfell Rehousing Policy”.

Ms Dent Coad had hit out at the council’s plans to impose a deadline on residents near Grenfell Tower making a decision about whether or not to return to their homes.

In his letter, Mr Taylor-Smith said: “First of all, can I say that I was very disappointed to receive your letter, particularly as it emerged on Inside Housing before I had the chance to see the letter and understand your concerns.

“Residents will not be asked to pay more than they can afford as a result of the Wider Grenfell Rehousing Policy.”

Inside Housing sent the council the letter ahead of publication and Ms Dent Coad’s office also claims it sent them a copy ahead of it appearing in this magazine.


READ MORE

Grenfell Inquiry Day 49: fire chief reveals frustration over lack of building plansGrenfell Inquiry Day 49: fire chief reveals frustration over lack of building plans
Grenfell neighbours hit out over rehousing proposalsGrenfell neighbours hit out over rehousing proposals
Kensington MP hits out over Grenfell neighbours’ rehousing deadlineKensington MP hits out over Grenfell neighbours’ rehousing deadline
Senior TMO staff let go but Kensington and Chelsea Council retains pre-Grenfell safety managerSenior TMO staff let go but Kensington and Chelsea Council retains pre-Grenfell safety manager

The policy concerns former residents of the Walkways, an area of low-rise housing connected to Grenfell which was evacuated following the fire.

The council has asked them to decide by 30 September whether they wish to return to their former homes or stay in temporary accommodation.

If they do not meet this deadline, their rents will be raised to temporary accommodation levels, and, Ms Dent Coad fears, they will be charged rents on both properties.

It was yesterday condemned by the Labour Party, which passed a motion at its national conference saying it was “appalled” and “disgusted” and demanding the letters be withdrawn.

Ms Dent Coad told Inside Housing of one case where a former Walkways tenant will have to pay four times their current rent as a result of this increase, and that the biggest family affected by the policy will have to pay up to £460 a week if they stay in temporary accommodation.


Related Files

EDC reply letter.pdfPDF, 1.3 MB

A letter sent from the council to former Walkways residents – also seen by Inside Housing – stated: “If you choose not to return home and you remain in temporary accommodation after the end of September, you will start to pay rent for your temporary home from 22 October 2018. You will no longer pay rent for your council home.”

It does not clarify, however, what happens to residents who do not make decisions in time for the deadline.

Mr Taylor-Smith wrote: “The policy states and the letter to residents clarifies that residents will no longer pay rent for their council home once they start paying for their temporary accommodation from 22 October 2018.”

In a response to Mr Taylor-Smith’s letter, Judith Blakeman, ward councillor, said she had spoken to households who had been told by council officers they could have to pay rents on two properties, pay full private sector rent and could lose their housing benefit.

Ms Dent Coad told Inside Housing: “Mr Taylor-Smith yet again fails to show empathy for those affected by the fire in this letter. I have local residents phoning my office on a regular basis, terrified about what this policy will mean for them, and yet he has the nerve to accuse me of scaremongering about the policy.”

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings