ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Grenfell Inquiry day 41: breathing equipment delay hampered rescues on upper floors, firefighter claims

A lack of vital breathing apparatus and communication failures meant firefighters’ efforts to rescue people on the higher floors of Grenfell Tower were delayed, it has been claimed. 

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Sharelines

Grenfell Inquiry day 41: breathing apparatus delay hampered rescue efforts on upper floors, firefighter claims #ukhousing

Key points

  • Firefighter claims that if service had more breathing apparatus they would have been able to save more residents
  • Adds that with better radio communications, crews would have been better placed to save residents on higher floors
  • “I have never heard anything like it,” says firefighter of 999 calls

Firefighter Daniel Morrison told the inquiry in his written evidence: “I believe that if we had more EDBA [extended duration breathing apparatus] sets earlier on, we may have been able to reach people trapped on the higher floors.”

Earlier, he said: “With better radio communications we could have received vital information from the crews that did get to the higher floors as to whether they had got to where they were sent to or not. It could have been better managed if we knew.”

The evidence tallies with that of watch manager Brian O’Keefe, who told the inquiry in July that fire officers ran out of firefighters in breathing apparatus.

Problems with radio sets allowing firefighters to communicate have also featured in other evidence given by firefighters at the Grenfell Inquiry.


READ MORE

Flammable window panels: the forgotten threatFlammable window panels: the forgotten threat
How tweaked guidance led to combustible insulation on high risesHow tweaked guidance led to combustible insulation on high rises
Six lessons from the Grenfell InquirySix lessons from the Grenfell Inquiry

Later today, Patrick Goulbourne borough commander for Tower Hamlets, told the inquiry that the amount of 999 calls he heard coming in over the radio on his way to the fire was unprecedented.

“I have never heard anything like it,” he said.

Mr Goulbourne, who a week prior to Grenfell had attended the London Bridge terror attack, was helping co-ordinate the efforts of firefighters on the night of the tragic blaze. Describing the tough conditions on the night, he wrote in his evidence: “There was a firefighters lift in the building but it was not useable. There was no floor above the fifth floor that wasn’t alight. A person could not have come out of the lift into anything other than smoke or fire and therefore death.”

He indicated a second staircase in the tower could have made a difference.

“In terms of what was required at Grenfell, if nothing else, it needed to have a second staircase so that there was one for evacuation and one for firefighters and the outlets to the dry riser were inaccessible and therefore useless for us,” he wrote.

Mr Goulbourne, who has 21 years service with the London Fire Brigade, also revealed he had attended an incident at Grenfell Tower previously during his first ever posting in North Kensington in 1997.

“From memory it was just a bog-standard fire that we were able to put out as normal, nothing out of the ordinary at all. The only difference that I can say is that back then there was no cladding on the block at all.”

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

Closing statements

 

Day 85: victims' lawyers attack the fire brigade

 

Further expert evidence

Including some additional evidence from emergency call handlers, bereaved and relatives

 

Day 84: further evidence from survivors and relatives

Day 83: swift evacuation of tower possible if residents alerted

Day 82: initial fire was extinguished but then returned to the flat

Day 81: overheating fridge-freezer most likely cause of fire

Day 80: fire doors installed did not match product tested

Day 79: resident advised to stay put despite fire in flat

Day 78: insulation and cladding material below required standard

Day 77: molten plastic spread blaze down tower

Day 76: 'stay put' should be dropped when fire spreads across floors

 

Other witness evidence

Police, ambulance, gas suppliers, council, TMO and call room operators give evidence

 

Day 75: call room operators give evidence

Day 74: further evidence from TMO officers

Day 73: TMO boss failed to pass information to firefighters

Day 72: fire finally extinguished when gas switched off

Day 71: further questions over stay put advice

Day 70: the police evidence

 

The bereaved, survivors and relatives’ evidence

 

Day 69: video shows smoke billowing through fire door

Day 68: KCTMO removed self closing mechanism and never replaced it

Day 67: gaps in cladding fixed with duct tape

Day 66: 'don't fix broken system with a sticking plaster'

Day 65: survivor dragged disabled man down nine floors to safety

Day 64: KCTMO 'did not replace broken fire door'

Day 63: foam insulation inside cladding 'exposed' says survivor

Day 62: father gives harrowing account of son's death

Day 61: council’s management organisation slammed for faulty electrics

Day 60: stay put advice ‘led to deaths’, residents say

Day 59: residents describe problems with new windows

Day 58: survivor describes how daughter saved his life

Day 57: firefighter evidence ‘a slap in the face’, says survivor

Day 56: relations with contractor were ‘toxic’

Day 55: resident 'never happy' with stay-put advice

Day 54: tenant gives evidence about housing association

Day 53: stay put advice 'felt like trap'

Day 52: resident saved by son's phone call

 

The firefighters’ evidence

 

Day 51: firefighter feared encouraging residents to jump

Day 50: the LFB commissioner

Day 49: fire chief reveals frustration over lack of building plans

Day 48: internal fire spread 'bigger story' than cladding

Day 47: fire officer considered evacuating crews over building collapse fears

Day 46: 'we were improvising' senior firefighter admits

Day 45: firefighter urged for abandonment of 'stay put' policy

Day 44: firefighter recalls radio signal difficulties

Day 43: call hander 'uncomfortable' with insisting residents stay put

Day 42: residents only told to leave if they called fire brigade back

Day 41: breathing equipment delay 'hampered rescues on upper floors'

Day 40: chiefs told firefighters to abandon policy

Day 39: firefighters reveal dramatic rescue of children

Day 38: firefighters issue aplogies to families

Day 37: council 'unable to provide tower plans'

Day 36: QC defends inquiry process

Day 35: Javid would welcome interim recommendations

Day 34: water from hose 'too weak' to reach the flames

Day 33: 'oh my god, we've been telling people to stay put'

Day 32: further fire fighter describes lack of equipment and low water pressure

Day 31: 'incredibly difficult' task of recording information outlined

Day 30: struggle to maintain control over rescue operation described

Day 29: fire service 'overwhelmed' by survival guidance calls

Day 28: 'the building beat us'

Day 27: firefighters 'forced to abandon plans to reach roof'

Day 26: poor signage hindered rescue efforts

Day 25: water pressure left firefighting equipment 'like garden hose'

Day 24: decision to abandon 'stay put' explored

Day 23: TV images 'could have assissted' rescue effort

Day 22: description of hectic scenes in the control centre

Day 21: account from the fire service 'nerve centre'

Day 20: firefighter describes 'huge volume' of calls from trapped residents

Day 19: firefighter 'given no training on cladding fires'

Day 18: evacuation would have been 'huge catastrophe'

Day 17: firefighters describe access and lift issues

Day 16: scenes of carnage likened to 9/11

Day 15: firefighters recount trauma of survival guidance calls

Day 14: firefighters describe spread of blaze

Day 13: firefighters recall radio difficulties

Day 12: "it was like a war zone"

Day 11: questions raised over fire fighters' radios

Day 10: watch manager emotional under questioning

Day nine: lead firefighter 'not trained in stay put policy'

 

The expert reports: authors give evidence to inquiry

 

Day eight: where the fire started

Day seven: what was in the cladding?

Day six: the cause and spread of the fire

Day five: expert highlights key issues

Day four: firefighters defend response to fire

Day three: council and contractors appear for the first time

Day two: lawyers for the survivors make their case

Day one: expert evidence released on cladding and stay put

 

The commemoration hearings

 

30 May: Grenfell Council 'recognised it should not house disabled victim above four storeys'

29 May: Anger on day six of the Grenfell Inquiry

25 May: Grenfell families 'forced to live in chimney with stay put policy'

24 May: Grenfell family complained about father being housed on 17th floor

23 May: Tributes to children on third day of Grenfell hearings

22 May: Emotions run high as Grenfell bereaved shown footage of the tower burning

21 May: Grenfell victims share tributes as inquiry opens

 

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.