ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Grenfell Inquiry day 61: council’s management organisation slammed for faulty electrics

A resident on the 16th floor of Grenfell Tower has told the inquiry how many of the electrics in his flat frequently malfunctioned and had never been fixed by the council’s management organisation despite repeated complaints.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty

Giving evidence to the court, 54-year-old Hamid Wahbi of flat 136, on the 16th floor of the tower, told how he regularly saw power and electrical faults which would render appliances unworkable.

His evidence came as a fellow resident Dr Naomi Li, who lived on the 22nd floor, spoke of how she had to step over bodies in the stairwell of the tower after eventually deciding to escape, after initially being told to stay in her flat.

In his evidence Mr Wahbi said he had raised the issues with the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation, (the TMO) which managed Grenfell Tower on behalf of council landlord the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea but received no assistance.

He said: “The lights in my sitting room would turn themselves on and off for no reason and the fuse for the power in the flat would repeatedly trip. I tried changing the light bulbs, but this made no difference.

“There were issues where the plugs did not always work. On one occasion, I returned back to my flat after a trip to Brighton and there was no power to the fridge. The fridge was brand new and I unplugged it and then I re-plugged it in and it worked.

“I do not know what was wrong with it. I reported all these issues to the TMO but cannot remember the exact dates as I went there so often. [The] TMO did not fix any of these issues.”

Describing the events on the night of the fire Mr Wahbi said that he initially heard a cracking sound coming from a window in his apartment which led him to open it. Once opened a large amount of smoke entered his apartment.

He said: “When I came to the kitchen there was no smoke at all. I opened the window, and when I came back to the kitchen what I saw from my window was something very very strange.”

Mr Wahbi said that when he moved to his window “the smoke and the fire was just following me and was something very, very strange. At that time everything went black, so most of the smoke, which came into the lobby came out of my flat first.”

Mr Wahbi made his way down one floor to check if the fire had been coming from the floors above before briefly returning to his flat. At one point Mr Wahbi described how he saw a firefighter who was in difficulty on the stairwell.

Asked about the events that occurred once he decided to make his escape, Mr Wahbi said that he had made the decision to run “as much as I could” from the 16th to the 15th floor and met

“different firefighters and people struggling to get in or to get out of their flats”.

“I just made quick speed to go right to the ground floor,” he added.

“Once I got out of the tower I took my way to the sports centre, tried to help as much as I can, I stood looking at the tower. I thought the firefighters would bring the fire under control but I just stood there in shock.”

The second witness to give evidence to the inquiry, Dr Naomi Li, told how the windows in her flat on the 22nd floor of the tower had been a constant problem since refurbishment work had taken place.

Giving evidence in the afternoon session Dr Li said: “It became a big problem when it became cold one night when it became clear that it was not just the sides but there was an actual gap between the wall and the window frame.

“You realised that [the windows] didn’t do the job properly. [The installers] didn’t bother to do the job properly.”

She added that someone from Rydon said they would come to fix the problems, “but they never did”, and the gaps in the windows were still in place on the night of the fire.

Dr Li said that she had read up on fire safety prior to the fire, and added that “her understanding” on what to do in case of a fire was to close all windows and doors and wait to be rescued.

Dr Li moved into the tower in 2011 and lived there with her husband Lee Chapman, who was not present on the night of the fire, and her cousin Lydia Chin-Hsuan Liao in flat 195.

Dr Li and her cousin sought refuge in flat 193 on the night of the fire following her first call to 999.

She had called 999 at around 1:21am and been told to stay in her apartment.

There was very light smoke at the time. However her neighbour told her that the fire was “in her kitchen”.

Dr Li said: “I just thought, ‘If the fire is in their kitchen, that is just too close to us’. I remember thinking whether the 999 call actually misunderstood my question or gave me wrong advice.

“If it was in Mariem’s flat, which is literally next to us, there was only one wall between us. I thought that was too risky and we had to leave.”

Dr Li warned her neighbours before leaving.

Making her way down the tower Dr Li described how on descending the stairwell she became aware that she was stepping over bodies.

“At the beginning of the journey down, it was very quick, we were running grabbing onto the rail, I was constantly calling Lydia’s name. After about four or five floors I started to feel like I was stepping on something. At first I thought it was jackets or wet towels.

“At one point I knew it was bodies but tried not to think about it and just keep running or walking down I cannot remember how many of them I might have stepped on. Whenever I stepped on something I told Lydia be careful there’s something on the floor. At one point she fell over and realised it was a person and screamed; I said, ‘We need to keep going.’”

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

Closing statements

 

Day 85: victims' lawyers attack the fire brigade

 

Further expert evidence

Including some additional evidence from emergency call handlers, bereaved and relatives

 

Day 84: further evidence from survivors and relatives

Day 83: swift evacuation of tower possible if residents alerted

Day 82: initial fire was extinguished but then returned to the flat

Day 81: overheating fridge-freezer most likely cause of fire

Day 80: fire doors installed did not match product tested

Day 79: resident advised to stay put despite fire in flat

Day 78: insulation and cladding material below required standard

Day 77: molten plastic spread blaze down tower

Day 76: 'stay put' should be dropped when fire spreads across floors

 

Other witness evidence

Police, ambulance, gas suppliers, council, TMO and call room operators give evidence

 

Day 75: call room operators give evidence

Day 74: further evidence from TMO officers

Day 73: TMO boss failed to pass information to firefighters

Day 72: fire finally extinguished when gas switched off

Day 71: further questions over stay put advice

Day 70: the police evidence

 

The bereaved, survivors and relatives’ evidence

 

Day 69: video shows smoke billowing through fire door

Day 68: KCTMO removed self closing mechanism and never replaced it

Day 67: gaps in cladding fixed with duct tape

Day 66: 'don't fix broken system with a sticking plaster'

Day 65: survivor dragged disabled man down nine floors to safety

Day 64: KCTMO 'did not replace broken fire door'

Day 63: foam insulation inside cladding 'exposed' says survivor

Day 62: father gives harrowing account of son's death

Day 61: council’s management organisation slammed for faulty electrics

Day 60: stay put advice ‘led to deaths’, residents say

Day 59: residents describe problems with new windows

Day 58: survivor describes how daughter saved his life

Day 57: firefighter evidence ‘a slap in the face’, says survivor

Day 56: relations with contractor were ‘toxic’

Day 55: resident 'never happy' with stay-put advice

Day 54: tenant gives evidence about housing association

Day 53: stay put advice 'felt like trap'

Day 52: resident saved by son's phone call

 

The firefighters’ evidence

 

Day 51: firefighter feared encouraging residents to jump

Day 50: the LFB commissioner

Day 49: fire chief reveals frustration over lack of building plans

Day 48: internal fire spread 'bigger story' than cladding

Day 47: fire officer considered evacuating crews over building collapse fears

Day 46: 'we were improvising' senior firefighter admits

Day 45: firefighter urged for abandonment of 'stay put' policy

Day 44: firefighter recalls radio signal difficulties

Day 43: call hander 'uncomfortable' with insisting residents stay put

Day 42: residents only told to leave if they called fire brigade back

Day 41: breathing equipment delay 'hampered rescues on upper floors'

Day 40: chiefs told firefighters to abandon policy

Day 39: firefighters reveal dramatic rescue of children

Day 38: firefighters issue aplogies to families

Day 37: council 'unable to provide tower plans'

Day 36: QC defends inquiry process

Day 35: Javid would welcome interim recommendations

Day 34: water from hose 'too weak' to reach the flames

Day 33: 'oh my god, we've been telling people to stay put'

Day 32: further fire fighter describes lack of equipment and low water pressure

Day 31: 'incredibly difficult' task of recording information outlined

Day 30: struggle to maintain control over rescue operation described

Day 29: fire service 'overwhelmed' by survival guidance calls

Day 28: 'the building beat us'

Day 27: firefighters 'forced to abandon plans to reach roof'

Day 26: poor signage hindered rescue efforts

Day 25: water pressure left firefighting equipment 'like garden hose'

Day 24: decision to abandon 'stay put' explored

Day 23: TV images 'could have assissted' rescue effort

Day 22: description of hectic scenes in the control centre

Day 21: account from the fire service 'nerve centre'

Day 20: firefighter describes 'huge volume' of calls from trapped residents

Day 19: firefighter 'given no training on cladding fires'

Day 18: evacuation would have been 'huge catastrophe'

Day 17: firefighters describe access and lift issues

Day 16: scenes of carnage likened to 9/11

Day 15: firefighters recount trauma of survival guidance calls

Day 14: firefighters describe spread of blaze

Day 13: firefighters recall radio difficulties

Day 12: "it was like a war zone"

Day 11: questions raised over fire fighters' radios

Day 10: watch manager emotional under questioning

Day nine: lead firefighter 'not trained in stay put policy'

 

The expert reports: authors give evidence to inquiry

 

Day eight: where the fire started

Day seven: what was in the cladding?

Day six: the cause and spread of the fire

Day five: expert highlights key issues

Day four: firefighters defend response to fire

Day three: council and contractors appear for the first time

Day two: lawyers for the survivors make their case

Day one: expert evidence released on cladding and stay put

 

The commemoration hearings

 

30 May: Grenfell Council 'recognised it should not house disabled victim above four storeys'

29 May: Anger on day six of the Grenfell Inquiry

25 May: Grenfell families 'forced to live in chimney with stay put policy'

24 May: Grenfell family complained about father being housed on 17th floor

23 May: Tributes to children on third day of Grenfell hearings

22 May: Emotions run high as Grenfell bereaved shown footage of the tower burning

21 May: Grenfell victims share tributes as inquiry opens

 

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings