ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

NHF: response to Letwin findings should be more investment in social rent

Sir Oliver Letwin’s review of faster building rates should lead to increased investment in social rented housing, the National Housing Federation (NHF) has said.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Planning-development-blueprint-MIN.jpg
Planning-development-blueprint-MIN.jpg
Sharelines

NHF believes the response to Sir Oliver Letwin's initial findings should be more investment in social rent #ukhousing

Alongside yesterday’s Spring Statement, the Conservative MP published a letter setting out his initial findings into the gap between planning permission and actual development.

He focused on the ‘absorption rate’ – the speed at which homes can be sold into local markets without reducing their value – as the primary reason for delays.


READ MORE

Letwin: speed of delivering affordable homes constrained by cross-subsidyLetwin: speed of delivering affordable homes constrained by cross-subsidy
Morning Briefing: NHF calls for action from Letwin to boost housebuildingMorning Briefing: NHF calls for action from Letwin to boost housebuilding
NHF calls for more social housing land ahead of Spring StatementNHF calls for more social housing land ahead of Spring Statement
The Letwin Review might just be worth waiting forThe Letwin Review might just be worth waiting for

Sir Oliver also noted the need to generate profits from homes sold at full market value to “cross-subsidise” affordable housing in the scheme as a potential delaying factor.

Reacting to the letter, Adam Morton, policy leader at the National Housing Federation, said: “The review is right to recognise that increasing the number of affordable homes is one of the key ways of building faster. Research shows that a development with 40% affordable housing will be built out 40% faster than one with less than 20%.

“However, as the review also notes, there is a limit to what can be achieved by our current approach to housebuilding.

“We think there are two initial steps the government can take. The first is to focus on investing directly in affordable housing, especially social rent. And the second is commit to bringing forward its land at a lower price – rather than simply selling to the highest bidder – so more affordable homes can be built on it.”

Sir Oliver will publish his findings by the end of June in the form of a draft analysis, with a full report before the November Budget.

In his letter, he said the “fundamental driver” behind slow build-out rates “appears to be the ‘absorption rate’”.

The “principal reason” why developers can “exercise control” over sales rates appears to be because there are “limited opportunities for rivals to enter large sites and compete for customers”.

He added that he has seen “ample evidence” that the speed at which affordable and social rented homes are completed on large sites is “constrained” by the requirement to cross-subsidise the affordable housing through open market sales.

He said: “Where the rate of sale of open market housing is limited by a given absorption rate for the character and size of home being sold by the house builder at or near to the price of comparable second-hand homes in the locality, this limits the house builder receipts available to provide cross-subsidies.”

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings