ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Second cladding system passes government test

Another cladding system has passed the government’s fire safety tests, as the testing process moves on to the more fire-resistant systems.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Sharelines

Second cladding system passes government test

The tests, which involve starting a fire at the bottom of a nine-metre-high model wall to see how quickly the fire spreads up the wall, have been designed to progress from the most likely to the least likely to fail.

They have tested panels made from three different kinds of aluminium composite material (ACM) – category one, category two and category three – with two different kinds of insulation behind them, in six different combinations. This is the fifth test, with only one of the previous four passing.

The ACM panels differ in the material used to fill the gap between them. Neither of the systems using category one ACM panels passed, suggesting that this is the least safe category of ACM.


READ MORE

Cladding system passes government test for first timeCladding system passes government test for first time
Grenfell-style cladding burned in less than seven minutesGrenfell-style cladding burned in less than seven minutes
Tower block cladding fails latest government testTower block cladding fails latest government test

The two insulation materials are polyisocyanurate (PIR) and mineral wool. A system using category two ACM panels and PIR insulation failed the test, but a system using category two and mineral wool insulation passed, suggesting that PIR insulation is the least safe type of insulation.

The latest system to pass was made from type three ACM panels and PIR insulation, although the government noted that the way a certain wall is constructed could cause a system with this combination to fail if, for example, fire breaks were not properly installed.

Polisocyanurate (PIR) insulation Mineral wool insulation
ACM with unmodified polyethylene filler (cat. 1) Fail Fail
ACM with fire-retardant polyethylene filler (cat. 2) Fail Pass
ACM with limited combustibility filler (cat. 3) Pass TBD

During the test, some of the ACM panels were consumed, and the PIR insulation exposed behind them did begin to burn, but the fire did not spread to the top of the wall as it had in all other tests involving PIR insulation.

The results illustrate that focusing on one specific kind of filler or one specific insulation material is not enough to reveal information about whether fire will spread up a wall. Rather, what prevented the spread of fire here was a combination of materials.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings