You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles
A housing association linked to a new model of private equity investment has been downgraded to a non-compliant rating today for “potentially putting its tenants at risk”, the Regulator of Social Housing has said.
Trinity Housing Association was given a G3 rating for governance and a V3 for financial viability - making it non-compliant on both counts in a stern and damning judgement from the regulator published today.
It said Trinity was “unable to evidence that it is meeting its statutory health and safety obligations thereby potentially putting its tenants at risk”.
Some properties housing vulnerable tenants, it said, have already been moved to other providers with “a shortened tenant consultation period”.
Furthermore, the regulator said, the board at the West Midlands-based association has “failed to manage its significant risks” and has “ceded control to third parties”.
The regulator added that Trinity’s failings amount to a “fundamental failure of governance”, exactly the same words it used to describe First Priority, a housing association with a similar model that almost went insolvent earlier this year.
It said: “The fact the board has failed to manage its significant risks, has ceded control to third parties and has allowed tenants to potentially be put at risk is a fundamental failure of governance."
Trinity and First Priority are both part of a new sub-class of housing associations which do not own many of their own homes, but rather lease them from private investors and listed funds.
Typically, these associations lease specialist supported housing for people with mental health issues and pay index-linked returns to the funds.
According to the regulator, Trinity owns or manages 1,309 homes in 56 local authorities containing 2,345 bed spaces aimed at “vulnerable adults with complex learning and physical disabilities”.
Documents submitted to the stock market reveal that Trinity leases homes from the real estate investment trust (REIT) Civitas. As of September, payments from Trinity to the fund accounted for 6.9% of Civitas’ annual income.
Inside Housing understands that the housing association also leases homes from the investment fund Henley SIPUT.
The regulator’s judgement stated that Trinity has in the past breached “certain lease terms due to its inability to make payments as they fell due”.
It added: “Cash flow projections presented to the regulator demonstrated it had not been able to secure access to sufficient liquidity to meet future lease payments.”
According to the judgement, the regulator, in conjunction with investors, has “solved the immediate cash crisis and bought the provider time”. It noted, however, that recovery will be “challenging”.
The judgement also stated: “There had been long standing, inherent conflicts of interest at board and management level which Trinity was unable to demonstrate it was managing effectively.
“The regulator has therefore concluded the board and management of Trinity have failed to ensure that its affairs are managed with an appropriate degree of skill and independence.”
The regulator said that in response to its engagement, Trinity has appointed five new board members. They are: Matt Cooney, chief operating officer of PA Housing; Joe Chambers, chief executive of B3 Living; Azmat Mir, head of development and regeneration; Ian Hughes, former chief executive of Rooftop Housing; and the investor Rupert Cottrell.
A spokesperson for Trinity said: “Trinity has been working closely with the Regulator of Social Housing since early 2018 and more intensively since being placed on its gradings under review list in September. We have proactively taken a number of steps to ensure compliance with the governance and financial viability standards.
“The association is grateful for the support of the regulator, our landlords and other stakeholders during what has been a challenging time for the association.”
The regulator is still expected to issue judgements on three other private equity-linked housing associations it has placed on its Grading Under Review list: Westmoreland, Encircle and Inclusion.
A spokesperson for Civitas Social Housing said: “As part of our overall engagement with all our housing association partners we are working closely with Trinity and its team, including the newly appointed directors.
“We are encouraged by the steps that have been and are being taken to move Trinity forward in a positive manner and by its commitment to working with the regulator to achieve enhanced regulatory gradings as soon as possible.
“Trinity provides a very valuable service of accommodation for people with care needs within a community setting, and this includes the Civitas properties which continue to meet our expectations both socially and economically.”
Inside Housing has contacted Henley for comment.
Update: at 15.17 on 8.11.18 a comment from Civitas Social Housing was added to the story.
Update: at 11.13 on 9.11.18 a comment from Trinity was added to the story.
The Regulator of Social Housing publishes regulatory judgements for all providers owning 1,000 or more social housing homes.
These judgements set out whether the provider is complying with the regulator’s governance and financial viability standards.
The regulator carries out an assessment either through a scheduled in-depth assessment, or reactive engagement (in which the regulator acts following information about a provider).
It then awards the provider a rating from one to four for financial viability (V) and a separate rating from one to four for governance (G).
Providers must score two or higher in both categories to be judged as complying with the standards.
As providers have increasingly taken on more risk to cross-subsidise social and affordable housing delivery through market-facing activity, the regulator has changed a number of associations’ viability ratings from V1 to V2.
The regulator often categorises this kind of regulatory action as ‘regrades’ rather than downgrades. Click here to read more.
Key to ratings:
V1/G1: Compliant
V2/G2: Compliant
V3/G3: Non-compliant and intensive regulatory engagement needed
V4/G4: Non-complaint, serious failures, leading to either intensive regulatory engagement or the use of enforcement powers
Rating straplines in full:
Governance ratings:
G1: The provider meets our governance requirements.
G2: The provider meets our governance requirements but needs to improve some aspects of its governance arrangements to support continued compliance.
G3: The provider does not meet our governance requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and in agreement with us the provider is working to improve its position.
G4: The provider does not meet our governance requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and the provider is subject to regulatory intervention or enforcement action.
Financial viability ratings:
V1: The provider meets our viability requirements and has the financial capacity to deal with a wide range of adverse scenarios.
V2: The provider meets our viability requirements. It has the financial capacity to deal with a reasonable range of adverse scenarios but needs to manage material risks to ensure continued compliance.
V3: The provider does not meet our viability requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and, in agreement with us, the provider is working to improve its position.
V4: The provider does not meet our viability requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and the provider is subject to regulatory intervention or enforcement action.
Provider | Governance | Viability | Explanation |
---|---|---|---|
A2 Dominion Housing Group | G1 | V2 | Viability downgrade |
Acis Group | G1 | V2 | No change |
Bromsgrove District Housing Trust | G1 | V1 | No change |
Byker Community Trust | G2 | V2 | No change |
Calico Homes | G1 | V1 | No change |
Christian Action (Enfield) Housing Association | G1 | V2 | No change |
Coastline Housing | G1 | V1 | No change |
Community Gateway Association | G1 | V1 | No change |
Cottsway Housing Association | G1 | V1 | No change |
East End Homes | G1 | V2 | No change |
Eden Housing Association | G1 | V2 | No change |
Habinteg Housing Association | G1 | V1 | Governance upgrade |
Halton Housing | G1 | V1 | No change |
Hanover Housing Association | G1 | V1 | No change |
Hastoe Housing Association | G1 | V2 | Viability downgrade |
Havebury Housing Partnership | G1 | V1 | No change |
Liverpool Mutual Homes | G1 | V1 | No change |
Livin Housing | G1 | V1 | No change |
Onward Group | G2 | V1 | No change |
Railway Housing Association and Benefit Fund | G1 | V1 | No change |
Sanctuary Housing Association | G1 | V1 | No change |
Saxon Weald Homes | G1 | V1 | No change |
Severn Vale Housing Society | G2 | V2 | No change |
Solon South West Housing Association | G1 | V1 | No change |
Thames Valley Housing Association | G1 | V2 | Merger |
Thirteen Housing Group | G1 | V1 | No change |
Vale of Aylesbury Housing Trust | G1 | V1 | No change |
Walsall Housing Group | G1 | V1 | No change |