ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Regulator was warned about ‘sham transactions’ in 2015

The Regulator of Social Housing was warned about a housing association accused of using “sham transactions” to violate agreements to provide affordable housing in 2015, Inside Housing can reveal.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

Regulator was warned about ‘sham transactions’ in 2015 #ukhousing

London District Housing Association (LDHA) was accused by Southwark Council in two court cases of “conspiring” to sell homes meant to be used as Section 106 affordable housing on the open market.

The association signed Section 106 agreements agreeing to provide homes as shared ownership but then sold them as market sale while pretending they had been ‘staircased’ to 100% ownership on day one, the council alleged.

Southwark Council took LDHA and several other organisations to the High Court in 2015 and 2016.

Both cases reached confidential settlements, with the defendants denying all allegations and none of them conceding they were any part of any sham transaction or conspiracy. In July last year, a judge authorised the council to buy the homes back.


READ MORE

Association accused of ‘sham transactions’ records large annual lossAssociation accused of ‘sham transactions’ records large annual loss
Association that sold social homes on open market slammed for fire safety failingsAssociation that sold social homes on open market slammed for fire safety failings
Council calls for investigation into association previously accused of ‘sham transactions’Council calls for investigation into association previously accused of ‘sham transactions’
Regulator investigates ‘sham transactions’ association following pressure from councilsRegulator investigates ‘sham transactions’ association following pressure from councils
The court battles over Section 106 deliveryThe court battles over Section 106 delivery

Following an Inside Housing investigation, Hackney Council called for the regulator to reopen its investigation into LDHA. The regulator previously investigated the association between March and May 2017, but closed that inquiry without providing any details.

Inside Housing understands that a third London borough complained to the regulator that LDHA had breached Section 106 agreements three years ago but has received only generic holding responses since, despite regularly chasing up the issue.

Meanwhile, Hackney Council has received only an initial acknowledgement that the regulator received its complaint, sent more than three weeks ago.

A Hackney Council spokesperson said the regulator told them the information the council sent would be considered alongside the other information it has already received on LDHA.

The regulator, however, has so far declined to comment on further documents provided to it by Inside Housing.

These indicated that housing associations funded by companies accused of “conspiring” with LDHA to violate Section 106 agreements have bought homes formerly owned by LDHA in nine boroughs in the capital.

A spokesperson for the regulator told Inside Housing: “The regulator considers all referrals it receives. We don’t comment on investigations, but report regulatory concerns through regulatory judgements and notices.”

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings