ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

‘Weaknesses’ found after investigation into L&Q repairs service

An independent investigation has identified various “weaknesses” that could cause a repairs controversy at a giant housing association to be repeated.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

L&Q’s repairs service has various “weaknesses” that could cause last year’s Southwark repairs controversy to be repeated #ukhousing @LQHomesMatter

A report finds 412 defects in an 85-home L&Q block, including a leaking roof and issues with plumbing, heating and sewage @LQHomesMatter @Campbelltickel1

A report on one of the association’s schemes described “poor service”, “inadequate responses” and “an inability… to act in the residents’ best interests”.

In August last year, the 95,000-home housing association admitted that its maintenance of Portway House on Old Kent Road had fallen below standards.

At the time, it promised an independent review, which has now been carried out by consultancy Campbell Tickell.


READ MORE

Downturn: why is L&Q cutting its surplus in half and what does it mean for the sector?Downturn: why is L&Q cutting its surplus in half and what does it mean for the sector?
L&Q rejected more than 200 homes from contractors due to quality concernsL&Q rejected more than 200 homes from contractors due to quality concerns
We got it wrong and let down our residentsWe got it wrong and let down our residents
L&Q carried out closed tender for major IT contract, leaked documents revealL&Q carried out closed tender for major IT contract, leaked documents reveal
L&Q to hold independent review after repairs controversyL&Q to hold independent review after repairs controversy

According to the report, seen by Inside Housing, the issues that arose at that scheme “have the potential to be replicated at another scheme” if L&Q doesn’t take “corrective action”.

Campbell Tickell found that there were 412 defects on the 85-home development, which disproportionately affected one block that is home to private and social tenants as well as shared owners. These included a leaking roof and issues with heating, plumbing and sewage.

David Montague, chief executive of L&Q, said: “We accept that we didn’t get things right at this scheme and we are determined to correct matters and learn lessons.

“That’s why we very much welcome Campbell Tickell’s report as it identifies further action we can take to embed quality in all that we do, provide an excellent service and ensure we resolve customer concerns quickly when things do go wrong.”

The report also found that L&Q staff had failed to pass information up the management chain, instead allowing it to be “contained in different pockets of the organisation”.


Related Files

LQ CT report.pdfPDF, 779 KB

It added: “Our principal concern from the cases we examined was that staff appeared to be operating as though following the complaints process was sufficient, rather than the primary goal being to resolve a customer’s reasonable concerns.”

According to the report, there is evidence to suggest that some of the problems were known to L&Q months before the homes were completed.

Other than initial work to fix boilers, however, residents were “left to get the best result that they could individually through the complaints process”.

This process failed to resolve the problems, meaning a leak on Boxing Day was “preventable”, according to Campbell Tickell.

Other weaknesses, the report said, were that lead responsibility was passed on at each stage of the project, that there were too many people involved without the “authority to take action”, and that there were “too many meetings”.

We at L&Q got it wrong and let down our residents

We at L&Q got it wrong and let down our residents

“I’m pulling no punches here: we got it wrong, we didn’t fix things when we should have, and as result we let down our residents”

David Montague, chief executive, L&Q

Click here to read an article by Mr Montague explaining more about the repairs controversy

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings