ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

DWP and council both refusing housing benefit for equity-linked ‘supported’ homes

A supported housing association linked to private equity investors faces rents on some of its homes going unpaid – as both central and local government deny responsibility for covering the tenants’ benefits. 

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

DWP and council both refusing housing benefit for equity-linked ‘supported’ homes #ukhousing

Gloucester City Council is understood to be refusing to continue paying the higher rates of housing benefit usually reserved for supported housing for some properties managed by Westmoreland Supported Housing Association.

This is because it believes the provider is not providing any care and support to residents of these homes, meaning it cannot justify paying housing benefit at supported housing rates, a claim Westmoreland denies.

The tenants therefore require Universal Credit to cover housing costs, but the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has also declined to pay, saying the costs should be met through housing benefit.

This would leave the rent unpaid, potentially posing a cashflow problem to the organisation which must make rental payments itself to the fund from which it leases the home.


READ MORE

Concern over planned eviction of tenants from supported living schemeConcern over planned eviction of tenants from supported living scheme
Council accuses association linked to investment funds of not providing support servicesCouncil accuses association linked to investment funds of not providing support services
People applying for ‘crisis grants’ in Scotland at highest levelPeople applying for ‘crisis grants’ in Scotland at highest level
Private equity-linked association slammed over ‘inherent conflicts of interest’Private equity-linked association slammed over ‘inherent conflicts of interest’

Westmoreland’s business model is based on leasing homes from private investors and making payments to them from its housing benefit income. It is obliged to continue making these payments, whether or not it can recover the rent from tenants.

The homes at the centre of the dispute are leased to Westmoreland by Henley Social Investments, a private fund which pays an undisclosed return to investors.

It is not known how many, if any, of the organisation’s other 1,378 homes leased from a variety of funds across 107 local authorities are affected.

Gloucester is also seeking to recover previous payments made to pay for care that it says was not provided despite being funded through benefits.

 

The dispute over rents was revealed in emails to a resident – seen by Inside Housing – regarding the arrangements for payment of their rent and confirming Gloucester will no longer cover the housing benefit.

The email describes the problem and urges the resident, who is in need of care and support, to contact Universal Credit themselves to resolve the issue.

Inside Housing has spoken to the resident, who confirmed that no one is currently paying their rent, adding: “Westmoreland want the monies to go direct to them, however a Universal Credit advisor has told me that it is not possible and the money has to be paid through my benefit payments.”

Westmoreland was declared non-compliant by the Regulator of Social Housing in November last year over “inherent conflicts of interest”.

DWP and Westmoreland declined to comment.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings