ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Housing association wins ‘cuckooing’ eviction case in Court of Appeal

A housing association has won a court case over its decision to evict a disabled man who police suspected was a victim of so-called ‘cuckooing’.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

Housing association wins ‘cuckooing’ eviction case in Court of Appeal #ukhousing

Aldwyck Housing Group, now part of 32,000-home Catalyst, was successful in the Court of Appeal earlier this week, after one of its former tenants unsuccessfully challenged a decision made by the High Court over an eviction last year.

According to court papers, the housing association obtained a possession order on Steven Forward’s Watford flat in March 2018 for “causing a nuisance or annoyance to persons residing nearby”.

Visitors to Mr Forward’s home had been using it to prepare and deal drugs, the papers said.

The police described the activity as typical of cuckooing – where drugs gangs take over the home of a vulnerable person for their operations.

Mr Forward is physically disabled with severe back, hip and knee pain down the right side of his body. He also described himself as mentally disabled too, as he suffers from depression, anxiety and a personality disorder.

Aldwyck and Watford Borough Council had warned Mr Forward that he risked eviction if the dealers kept coming to his home and the landlord offered support to keep them away, but the problems persisted until a final police search resulted in the flat being hit by a closure order from the police.

This was followed by a possession claim from Aldwyck in July 2017 on the grounds that Mr Forward had breached his tenancy agreement by causing a nuisance and using the property for illegal purposes. A trial took began in January 2018. In March 2018, Judge Wood at the Watford County Court ruled that there had been breaches to the tenancy agreement and an order for possession was made.

During the proceedings, Aldwyck admitted that it failed to consider its public sector equality duty (PSED) not to disadvantage Mr Forward under Section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 before evicting him.


READ MORE

Give social landlords the powers to fight county lines, as COVID-19 makes the threat worseGive social landlords the powers to fight county lines, as COVID-19 makes the threat worse
How social landlords are responding to ‘county lines’ drugs gangsHow social landlords are responding to ‘county lines’ drugs gangs
London council’s housing allocations policy is discriminatory, rules Court of AppealLondon council’s housing allocations policy is discriminatory, rules Court of Appeal
Supreme Court rules against Birmingham Council in homelessness caseSupreme Court rules against Birmingham Council in homelessness case

Despite this, Judge Wood disagreed that Mr Forward was cuckooed, and also rejected that Aldwyck discriminated against him with the eviction because the move “was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim”.

Justice Cheema-Grubb of the High Court supported the county court’s ruling and said even with a proper equality impact assessment, Aldwyck would have decided to evict Mr Forward.

However, Toby Vanhegan, acting for Mr Forward, argued in the Court of Appeal that any possession decision reached without complying with duties around the PSED “must always be quashed” and called for the possession order to be set aside.

In response, Nicholas Grundy, representing Aldwyck, said there was ample material to show that if the landlord had complied with the PSED, it would have still sought a possession and had that possession granted.

This week three Court of Appeal judges dismissed Mr Forward’s subsequent appeal that Aldwyck’s breach of the PSED would have made a difference to the possession order and upheld the High Court’s decision.

Lord Justice Longmore, backed by Lord Justice Bean and Lord Justice Moylan, said “there should be no rigid rule that non-compliance with the PSED should always result in quashing the relevant decision”.

He added the district judge was right to conclude that there “was no viable option for the landlord other than to seek possession” so carrying out the PSED would not have changed Aldwyck’s decision.

Mr Vanhegan said the eviction should be quashed, “otherwise local authorities will have no incentive to comply with the duty and no opportunity to learn from their breach of duty”.

But Lord Justice Longmore said: “For my part, I would resist the notion that the court should act as some sort of mentor or nanny to decision-makers.”

He also dismissed Mr Vanhegan’s submission that Justice Cheema-Grubb was wrong to reject the claim that Mr Forward has a mental disability, arguing this did not affect her ruling.

Mr Forward was ordered to pay Aldwyck’s costs relating to the appeal.

Kirsty Pepper, executive director of housing and customer services at Aldwyck Housing Group, said: “We don’t take the decision to seek possession of our properties lightly, so consequently we made sure we did what we needed to do through our due diligence process.

“Mr Forward’s behaviour wasn’t only illegal but it was anti-social and we can’t ignore this.

“The decision by the court to dismiss our former tenant’s appeal is warmly welcomed and it indicates the judge is satisfied with the process we followed.

“We hope Mr Forward’s neighbours can once again enjoy living in their homes and community.”

Future of Work Festival

Future of Work Festival

New for 2019, Inside Housing’s Future of Work Festival will bring together HR and organisational development professionals from the housing sector to discuss and explore the challenges of how to successfully evolve towards the working environment of the future.

Seize this opportunity to rethink your workforces and workplaces by reconsidering the roles of individuals, organisations, automation technology and how society will approach work.

To register click here

Assess and benchmark your business strategy with the leaders in the housing sector:

  • Defining the Future of Work: what does it look like, what will be the implications, how do you rethink your workforce strategy?
  • How to embed Electronic Data Interchange into your workforce, attract the widest pool of talent, be authentic and innovative, keep your workforce happy and productive, and position your brand
  • Identifying, assessing and closing the skill gaps: what skills will be required in the future and how do you prepare for the undefined?
  • Appealing to and maintaining a multi-generational workforce: how to address differing career aspirations, expectations, behaviours and values
  • How best to implement the best tech, for example, big data, artificial intelligence, automation, blockchain and the Internet of Things. How will this change workplace skills and wages? How do you evolve towards a ‘STEMpathetic’ workforce?
  • Providing your HR and OD department with the right skills and toolkits to revise talent, organisational structures and business models. Be social and environmentally friendly, and data driven – investing in disruptive tech, skills training and ethical use of tech
  • Promoting well-being and employee experience
  • Introducing training and learning as part of the career path
  • Embracing agile working – understanding how flexible and alternative working arrangements can boost productivity

The festival will take place on 17 September, at Westminster Bridge, County Hall in London.

To register click here

 

 

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings