ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

NHF backs combustible materials ban on high rises

The National Housing Federation (NHF) has given its support to government proposals to ban the use of combustible materials on tall buildings, but has warned this could lead to increased costs and loss of space.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

NHF supports combustibles ban but warns of increased cost and loss of space #ukhousing

In its response to the government’s post-Grenfell consultation, the NHF warned the ban would “not be simple to implement and careful consideration of unintended consequences is required”.

It said that since fires often start in the lower parts of buildings the ban should apply from the ground up.

Direct costs arising from the ban on some materials now used could range from negligible to a 15% increase, the NHF said.


READ MORE

Government proposes changing legislation to enforce combustibles ban for high risesGovernment proposes changing legislation to enforce combustibles ban for high rises
MPs recommend extending combustibles ban to existing buildingsMPs recommend extending combustibles ban to existing buildings
Raab commits to ban of combustible claddingRaab commits to ban of combustible cladding
RIBA hits back at government expert’s suggestion of limits on combustible material banRIBA hits back at government expert’s suggestion of limits on combustible material ban

It also warned that there could be extra indirect costs associated with loss of floor space from using bulkier fire-resistant materials.

A thorough impact assessment should precede any ban, it urged.

If the government implements a ban but with exemptions for some materials “an exemption list will result in a range of materials that can still be used in a multitude of combinations”.

“This would mean a residual risk of unintended consequences remains for both fire safety and general building performance,” it said.

The NHF suggested this could be overcome with a registered supplier scheme, under which third-party testing would provide “assurance to those procuring and living in residential blocks”.

Tested and approved details for different façade types could be developed with similar registration and checking procedures to those already widely used within the construction industry.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings