ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

One in three landlords expects to need at least two years to comply with Building Safety Bill, survey finds

A third of housing bosses expect their organisations will need more than two years to get up to speed with the Building Safety Bill’s requirements, while costs remain a major concern, new research has found.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Complexity, the absence of clarity, competing organisational priorities and the volume of high-rise buildings were all issues with compliance (picture: Getty)
Complexity, the absence of clarity, competing organisational priorities and the volume of high-rise buildings were all issues with compliance (picture: Getty)
Sharelines

A third of social and private landlords think it will take more than 25 months to demonstrate compliance with the Building Safety Bill #UKHousing

Nearly half of social and private landlords think the Building Safety Bill will have a significant negative impact on their finances #UKHousing

A poll of social and private landlords representing a total of 1,048 high-rise buildings found that 33% thought it would take them more than 25 months to demonstrate compliance with all parts of the Building Safety Bill.

Published in July, the bill contains wide-ranging changes to current laws concerning building safety, including the introduction of a new regulator that can impose sanctions on those found to be in breach of safety standards.

Respondents highlighted several issues with complying with the legislation, including its complexity, the absence of clarity, competing organisational priorities and the volume of high-rise buildings some would need to submit to the new regulator.

The cost of becoming compliant was also an issue, with 45% saying the bill would have a significant negative impact on their organisations’ finances and a further 33% saying it would have a moderately negative impact.


READ MORE

‘Defective’ cavity barriers ‘contributed nothing’ to slow fire in Worcester Park blaze, report reveals‘Defective’ cavity barriers ‘contributed nothing’ to slow fire in Worcester Park blaze, report reveals
‘Lockdown made our relationships stronger’‘Lockdown made our relationships stronger’
Flat sale ‘slowdown’ as government guidance causes mortgage refusals on buildings under 18mFlat sale ‘slowdown’ as government guidance causes mortgage refusals on buildings under 18m
The role of fire alarms in building safetyThe role of fire alarms in building safety
The role of the building safety manager: what do landlords need to consider when recruiting?The role of the building safety manager: what do landlords need to consider when recruiting?

More than half of respondents (56%) had fewer than 20 high-rise buildings in their portfolio, with 33% having 20 to 150, and 11% having more than 150.

More than three-quarters of respondents (78%) said their organisations had so far written no ‘building safety cases’, while 22% said they had written between one and five.

Building safety cases are part of a new building safety regime the government proposed in April as part of its response to its ‘Building a Safer Future’ consultation.

Organisations will also have to name ‘dutyholders’ responsible for fire and structural safety risks in buildings. Dutyholders will be required to create a safety case containing all the relevant information for each building.

No respondents said they could provide an estimate for the average cost of producing each building safety case.

The survey was carried out by software platform TrackMyRisks on behalf of the Building Safety Register.

Matt Hodges-Long, co-founder of TrackMyRisks, said: “Much of the media attention relating to Building Safety Bill impacts is understandably written from a resident’s perspective.

“We felt it was important to understand the scale of impact on the supply side of the equation so we surveyed senior housing execs representing more than 1,000 higher risk buildings.

“The overwhelming narrative through all of our one-to-one interviews was the absence of guidance, the scale of the implementation challenge and how long it would take to achieve the required level of cultural change."

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings