You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles
Social landlords should be approaching the government for more money, not their tenants, writes Pat Turnbull, a regional delegate from the London Tenants Federation
When it comes to rent rises, social housing tenants face a united front of the government, the councils and the housing associations. The council and housing association landlords called for a 10-year schedule of above-inflation rent rises, while the government has proposed five years.
Two recent annual rises of 7% and 7.7% show what even rent rises at inflation levels can mean. The London Tenants Federation has called instead for a rent freeze, recognising the rises in food and energy prices that are already over-stretching the budgets of thousands of social rent tenants.
Social rent tenants have had above-inflation rent rises for most of the past 25 years. We can see the effects in rising rent arrears.
According to the 2025 Rental Arrears Index, arrears owed to councils by their social housing tenants rose by 55% between 2019 and 2025, and were 5% higher in 2025 than the amount owed in 2024. The National Housing Federation also reported in June 2025 that the proportion of residents in rent arrears had increased from the previous quarter.
But the landlords got their way, and the government has decreed 10 years of rent rises, with inflation +1%. And now the government has come up with a further rent rise proposal, rent convergence.
The paper did not even ask whether rent convergence should be implemented – the government had already decided. The only question was whether the rises should be an additional £1, £2 or £3 per week.
“The government did not even ask whether rent convergence should be implemented – it had already decided”
Predictably, given their previous call for ten years of above-inflation rent rises, London Councils and the National Housing Federation are asking for the maximum £3 increase.
To make matters worse, London Councils want “the introduction of a London Formula Rent Reset, giving boroughs extra flexibility over setting social rents to reflect London’s high property costs”.
These costs have made London’s housing unaffordable even for people on a decent salary. According to the government’s paper, in 2024 the average private rented sector rent in London was £471.96 a week.
How can these figures be made a yardstick for the rents of people on some of the lowest incomes in the capital?
It is particularly disappointing that social landlords should be trying to squeeze their own tenants, when they should instead be approaching the government for more money for maintenance, construction and buy-back of social rented housing.
The government has announced a 10-year £39bn Social and Affordable Homes programme, so even that amount will not all be for social rented homes.
Shelter have called for £30bn over the first five years in government to build social rented homes. The Chartered Institute of Housing estimated that £39bn was required over five years, as well as calling for council housing revenue accounts to be relieved of £17bn debt. The National Housing Federation itself called for £7.8bn a year.
“These rent rises will not provide the councils and housing associations with anything like the funds they need to meet the challenges that face them”
In September 2024, 100 of England’s council landlords called for £12bn extra over the next five years so that they could maintain the Decent Homes Standard. Instead of pressing home these claims with the government, the landlords have turned on their tenants.
But these rent rises will not provide the councils and housing associations with anything like the funds they need to meet the challenges in upkeep and new building that face them.
We already had rent convergence from 2002 to 2015, years in which few social rent homes were built, and in which, apart from the government funded Decent Homes programme of the last Labour government, the general decline in the standard of upkeep of many social rented homes continued.
Nor did rent convergence, as is argued, make rents fairer. As the London Tenants Federation argued in 2019, rent convergence resulted in “an extremely complicated, quite random, unfair and unjustified array of different rents for exactly the same type of rented homes”.
The neglect and underfunding of the social rent sector goes back more than 40 years. The 2010 Spending Review alone, as the 2014 Lyons Housing Review pointed out, saw capital investment in housing cut by 63% in real terms.
Squeezing tenants till the pips squeak will just further impoverish people who cannot afford it, without solving the funding problems that have made such a huge contribution to the current housing crisis.
Pat Turnbull, regional delegate, London Tenants Federation
Sign up to Inside Housing’s Tenancy Management newsletter, a weekly round-up of stories on all aspects of tenancy management, from allocations to evictions.
Click here to register and receive the Tenancy Management newsletter straight to your inbox.
And subscribe to Inside Housing by clicking here.
Already have an account? Click here to manage your newsletters.
Related stories