ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Grenfell Inquiry day 51: fire chief feared he would encourage people to jump as he tried to beckon them out of the building

A senior fire manager who attended the Grenfell blaze said he was hesitant to beckon people down from higher windows in case it was misconstrued as encouraging them to jump, and struggled to communicate the evacuate order to residents.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Sharelines

Grenfell Inquiry day 51: fire chief feared he would encourage people to jump as he tried to beckon them out of the building #ukhousing

Dave O’Neill, a group manager for operational policy at the London Fire Brigade, said he was made aware that two people had already jumped from the building when he arrived at the scene in the early hours of the morning.

He also said he could see a number of people inside the tower, including one man waving a towel from a window.

“At this point the block looked like a derelict building, there were lots of faces at windows with orange glow behind them. It did not look good,” he said.

The manager, who was tasked with identifying hazards such as falling debris during the fire, said when the instruction to residents was changed from stay put to evacuate, he had no way of communicating it apart from a loud hailer.

“I was very mindful that waving of arms and beckoning, and I do recall considering that, may have been misconstrued as asking people to jump,” he said.

“For that reason I discounted, if you like, physical communication. I am very clear about that because I did not want to encourage that.

“We went back to the loud hailer and really it was the responsibility of those working inside.” He said that he had no way of knowing whether residents understood the advice.


READ MORE

Brokenshire issues warning to private firms about cladding costsBrokenshire issues warning to private firms about cladding costs
Government urges removal of ‘small or partial’ amounts of Grenfell-style claddingGovernment urges removal of ‘small or partial’ amounts of Grenfell-style cladding
Six months on from Grenfell, what has changed?Six months on from Grenfell, what has changed?

Mr O’Neill talked extensively about his concerns about the possibility that the tower would collapse as the fire progressed.

He said that he had several conversations with other senior managers about the risks to firefighters working within the building but decided to keep pursuing the rescue effort regardless.

“In any other incident would that have been an acceptable level of risk?” Andrew Kinnier, counsel to the inquiry, asked. “No, absolutely not,” Mr O’Neill replied.

“[Assistant commissioner Andy Roe and I] had several discussions during the night about at what point do we stop,” he said, adding that they decided to continue even if it meant “serious injury to one of our firefighters”.

Among other things, he had considered getting a helicopter to rescue people from the roof of the tower but decided that it was not viable because of the heat coming from the top of the building.

He praised the teams who worked to try and save people during the blaze. “I hope no one feels any sense of guilt, they did everything possible and more, it was exceptional work. I have since found our equipment as high as the 22nd floor.”

He added: “It was an unprecedented amount of resources deployed but I feel it was an impossible task to save everyone.

“I certainly felt that this should not be happening in the UK today.”

The inquiry also heard from two firefighters who had visited Grenfell Tower before the fire in order to establish how to fight a blaze at the building, particularly after it was refurbished.

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry

Closing statements

 

Day 85: victims' lawyers attack the fire brigade

 

Further expert evidence

Including some additional evidence from emergency call handlers, bereaved and relatives

 

Day 84: further evidence from survivors and relatives

Day 83: swift evacuation of tower possible if residents alerted

Day 82: initial fire was extinguished but then returned to the flat

Day 81: overheating fridge-freezer most likely cause of fire

Day 80: fire doors installed did not match product tested

Day 79: resident advised to stay put despite fire in flat

Day 78: insulation and cladding material below required standard

Day 77: molten plastic spread blaze down tower

Day 76: 'stay put' should be dropped when fire spreads across floors

 

Other witness evidence

Police, ambulance, gas suppliers, council, TMO and call room operators give evidence

 

Day 75: call room operators give evidence

Day 74: further evidence from TMO officers

Day 73: TMO boss failed to pass information to firefighters

Day 72: fire finally extinguished when gas switched off

Day 71: further questions over stay put advice

Day 70: the police evidence

 

The bereaved, survivors and relatives’ evidence

 

Day 69: video shows smoke billowing through fire door

Day 68: KCTMO removed self closing mechanism and never replaced it

Day 67: gaps in cladding fixed with duct tape

Day 66: 'don't fix broken system with a sticking plaster'

Day 65: survivor dragged disabled man down nine floors to safety

Day 64: KCTMO 'did not replace broken fire door'

Day 63: foam insulation inside cladding 'exposed' says survivor

Day 62: father gives harrowing account of son's death

Day 61: council’s management organisation slammed for faulty electrics

Day 60: stay put advice ‘led to deaths’, residents say

Day 59: residents describe problems with new windows

Day 58: survivor describes how daughter saved his life

Day 57: firefighter evidence ‘a slap in the face’, says survivor

Day 56: relations with contractor were ‘toxic’

Day 55: resident 'never happy' with stay-put advice

Day 54: tenant gives evidence about housing association

Day 53: stay put advice 'felt like trap'

Day 52: resident saved by son's phone call

 

The firefighters’ evidence

 

Day 51: firefighter feared encouraging residents to jump

Day 50: the LFB commissioner

Day 49: fire chief reveals frustration over lack of building plans

Day 48: internal fire spread 'bigger story' than cladding

Day 47: fire officer considered evacuating crews over building collapse fears

Day 46: 'we were improvising' senior firefighter admits

Day 45: firefighter urged for abandonment of 'stay put' policy

Day 44: firefighter recalls radio signal difficulties

Day 43: call hander 'uncomfortable' with insisting residents stay put

Day 42: residents only told to leave if they called fire brigade back

Day 41: breathing equipment delay 'hampered rescues on upper floors'

Day 40: chiefs told firefighters to abandon policy

Day 39: firefighters reveal dramatic rescue of children

Day 38: firefighters issue aplogies to families

Day 37: council 'unable to provide tower plans'

Day 36: QC defends inquiry process

Day 35: Javid would welcome interim recommendations

Day 34: water from hose 'too weak' to reach the flames

Day 33: 'oh my god, we've been telling people to stay put'

Day 32: further fire fighter describes lack of equipment and low water pressure

Day 31: 'incredibly difficult' task of recording information outlined

Day 30: struggle to maintain control over rescue operation described

Day 29: fire service 'overwhelmed' by survival guidance calls

Day 28: 'the building beat us'

Day 27: firefighters 'forced to abandon plans to reach roof'

Day 26: poor signage hindered rescue efforts

Day 25: water pressure left firefighting equipment 'like garden hose'

Day 24: decision to abandon 'stay put' explored

Day 23: TV images 'could have assissted' rescue effort

Day 22: description of hectic scenes in the control centre

Day 21: account from the fire service 'nerve centre'

Day 20: firefighter describes 'huge volume' of calls from trapped residents

Day 19: firefighter 'given no training on cladding fires'

Day 18: evacuation would have been 'huge catastrophe'

Day 17: firefighters describe access and lift issues

Day 16: scenes of carnage likened to 9/11

Day 15: firefighters recount trauma of survival guidance calls

Day 14: firefighters describe spread of blaze

Day 13: firefighters recall radio difficulties

Day 12: "it was like a war zone"

Day 11: questions raised over fire fighters' radios

Day 10: watch manager emotional under questioning

Day nine: lead firefighter 'not trained in stay put policy'

 

The expert reports: authors give evidence to inquiry

 

Day eight: where the fire started

Day seven: what was in the cladding?

Day six: the cause and spread of the fire

Day five: expert highlights key issues

Day four: firefighters defend response to fire

Day three: council and contractors appear for the first time

Day two: lawyers for the survivors make their case

Day one: expert evidence released on cladding and stay put

 

The commemoration hearings

 

30 May: Grenfell Council 'recognised it should not house disabled victim above four storeys'

29 May: Anger on day six of the Grenfell Inquiry

25 May: Grenfell families 'forced to live in chimney with stay put policy'

24 May: Grenfell family complained about father being housed on 17th floor

23 May: Tributes to children on third day of Grenfell hearings

22 May: Emotions run high as Grenfell bereaved shown footage of the tower burning

21 May: Grenfell victims share tributes as inquiry opens

 

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.