ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

Government rows back on proposed watering down of Grenfell Inquiry PEEPs recommendation

The government appears to have U-turned on plans to water down a Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommendation to compel high-rise building owners to develop evacuation plans for disabled residents.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

The Home Office has rowed back on fire safety guidance that stated it was “unrealistic” for landlords to provide all disabled tenants with evacuation plans #UKhousing

In a consultation document published yesterday, the Home Office said: “We propose to require the responsible person to prepare a personal emergency evacuation plan (PEEP) for every resident in a high-rise residential building who self-identifies to them as unable to self-evacuate (subject to the resident’s voluntary self-identification) and to do so in consultation with them.”

The proposal closely resembles a recommendation in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s phase one report “that the owner and manager of every high-rise residential building be required by law to prepare personal emergency evacuation plans for all residents whose ability to self-evacuate may be compromised (such as persons with reduced mobility or cognition).”

In a previous consultation published last summer, the government had proposed that PEEPs should only be required in buildings with a waking watch in place, primarily those with unsafe cladding.

Inside Housing later revealed that the move to water down the inquiry’s recommendation came after an industry lobbying group branded it “totally impracticable” at a behind-closed-doors meeting with officials.


READ MORE

Bereaved Grenfell family threatens legal action over government plan to republish withdrawn fire safety guideBereaved Grenfell family threatens legal action over government plan to republish withdrawn fire safety guide
Government watered down implementation of Grenfell recommendations for disabled people after push from lobbyistsGovernment watered down implementation of Grenfell recommendations for disabled people after push from lobbyists
Home Office republishes controversial fire safety guidance despite legal threatHome Office republishes controversial fire safety guidance despite legal threat
KCTMO did not prepare evacuation plans despite being asked about blind Grenfell resident by firefighters in 2016KCTMO did not prepare evacuation plans despite being asked about blind Grenfell resident by firefighters in 2016
Two large housing associations partner with university on decarbonisation projectTwo large housing associations partner with university on decarbonisation project

The previous proposal on PEEPs had been met with heavy criticism from survivors of the Grenfell Tower fire, with the Home Office promising to reconsult over the issue after settling legal action by one bereaved family who lost a loved one with a disability to the blaze.

The new consultation came a day after the Home Office republished fire safety guidance which contracts Grenfell Inquiry recommendations on evacuation plans.

It accompanied the controversial document with a note stating that it is interim guidance while the department consults on changes to the Fire Safety Order.

The consultation on PEEPs opened yesterday will run until 19 July.

On the ‘stay put’ strategy, the Home Office document said current guidance “states that stay put remains an appropriate strategy in most blocks of flats where compartmentation works to stop the spread of fire and where there are suitably protected means of escape”.

It added: “A joint Home Office and Ministry, of Housing, Communities and Local Government steering group was set up to support a research project to review means of escape provisions in blocks of flats including the use of a stay put strategy and evacuation.”

Sign up for our fire safety newsletter

Sign up for our fire safety newsletter
Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.
By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Browsing is anonymised until you sign up. Click for more info.
Cookie Settings