ao link

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

House builders considering ‘legality’ of government threats over cladding funding

The trade body representing UK house builders has accused ministers of acting in a way that is “clearly not proportionate” as it considers the “legality” of the government’s plan to force developers to pay for cladding remediation work. 

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

LinkedIn IHThe trade body representing UK house builders has accused ministers of acting in a way that is “clearly not proportionate” as it considers the “legality” of the government’s plan to force developers to pay for cladding remediation work #UKhousing

The Home Builders Federation (HBF) has toughened its rhetoric after the government issued a letter last week which called on developers to sign a legally binding agreement committing them to funding the remediation of dangerous cladding on buildings between 11-18 metres. 

Developers who fail to sign up to the agreement may be prevented from participating in the market, the government said in its letter. 

The open letter marked the latest update in the government’s plan to force developers to pay for cladding remediation on medium-sized buildings, which was first announced by housing secretary Michael Gove last month. 

At the time, Mr Gove said developers would have until March to reach an agreement with the government to fund the work, which it estimates will cost £4bn. 

The details of the agreement are currently being discussed through a series of roundtables between ministers and the industry. 


Read more

Government outlines ‘legally binding’ building safety commitments for developersGovernment outlines ‘legally binding’ building safety commitments for developers
Government sought ‘independent experts’ to help rebut critical media reports two days after Grenfell fireGovernment sought ‘independent experts’ to help rebut critical media reports two days after Grenfell fire
Grenfell Tower Inquiry diary week 62: ‘Did it ever occur to you that this act of collaboration was, in one sense, corrupting?’Grenfell Tower Inquiry diary week 62: ‘Did it ever occur to you that this act of collaboration was, in one sense, corrupting?’
House builders submit counter proposals to Gove over cladding fundingHouse builders submit counter proposals to Gove over cladding funding

In its latest response, the HBF said it has “engaged constructively with government to find solutions and remove the burden of costs to remediate buildings from leaseholders”, but said the government’s open letter made it “clear” it was “not taking the same approach”.

“The latest proposal, an open-ended and variable annual tax on UK home builders at a rate decided by a government department each year, under the threat of being unable to operate in the UK, is clearly not proportionate,” it added. 

The trade body said it is “considering our position on the legality of the proposals”, which it said “target only UK home builders who are already working on their buildings and not the plethora of foreign companies and investment vehicles responsible for a large proportion of the remaining buildings that require remediation”.

The government’s open letter set out six commitments that it wants developers to sign up to (see box below), including a contribution to a new fund for buildings between 11 and 18 metres tall.

According to the HBF, UK house builders have already spent or committed roughly £1bn to remediate buildings.

It is calling on the government to “ensure material providers, including overseas companies that manufactured and sold the materials that have created the problems, are part of the solution”.

In its open letter, the government said it was engaging with product manufacturers around what level of contributions they will be forced to make to help fix the crisis. 

The HBF also urged the government to “recognise the failings of its building regulations regime on which the industry has relied”.

The six commitments

In a letter to developers, the government set out the following six commitments that it wants the companies to sign up to:

  • A commitment to prompt remediation of historical defects that are already identified or are discovered in future in buildings the developer or persons associated with it has had a role in developing
  • Regular reporting on pace and transparency of work
  • Compliance with agreed controls and frameworks on the proportionality of the work to be undertaken
  • Contribution to an 11 to 18-metre remediation fund for those buildings where direct remediation has not occurred or cannot occur
  • Evidence of senior officers and managers being fit and proper persons to undertake major scale development with lasting social and economic impact
  • Suitable processes to audit, assure, and review membership, including consequences of joining and conditions of admission for new entrants

Sign up for our fire safety newsletter

Sign up for our fire safety newsletter