The Grenfell Tower Inquiry currently has “no expertise or experience in areas of community relations and social housing” as it seeks to recruit a third panellist, according to an official recruitment document.
The document, seen by Inisde Housing, spells out that while it has legal and architectural expertise, it is missing knowledge of these areas – which will become increasingly relevant as the inquiry progresses.
For the inquiry’s second phase, its chair, retired judge Sir Martin Moore-Bick, is supposed to consider the evidence and deliver the final report as part of a three-person panel.
But following the resignation of the intended third panel member ahead of the inquiry beginning in January, one chair remains vacant and efforts to find a candidate to fill it have so far proved unsuccessful.
The document detailing the role was sent out to potential candidates by recruitment firm Perrett Laver on behalf of the Cabinet Office, which is managing the recruitment.
It says: “The inquiry panel has both legal and architectural expertise, and the inquiry has a number of expert witnesses covering the technical issues under consideration in phase two.
“The inquiry currently has no expertise or experience in the areas of community relations and social housing, which will be relevant to module three of phase two. It is this knowledge gap that the new panel appointment will address.”
Module three will cover issues including the complaints made by residents and the way they were handled by Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation, the ALMO that managed council homes in Kensington and Chelsea.
Under the pre-coronavirus timetable, this module was due to begin in June, but is now unlikely to begin until at least autumn.
The third panellist was originally intended to be Professor Nabeel Hamdi, a social housing academic from Oxford Brookes University, but he stepped down in December last year after “reflecting on the time commitments needed”.
His replacement, engineer Benita Mehra, stepped down in January after links emerged between a company she was associated with and Arconic, the company that supplied the cladding.
This means the first six weeks of evidence have been heard only by Sir Martin and architect Thouria Istephan.
Last week, an application was made by lawyers representing the survivors to speed this process up – noting the inquiry’s duty to take racial discrimination into account as a potential factor in the disaster.
The recruitment document outlined a person specification for the role and said it is seeking someone who possesses:
It said it was also seeking a candidate who “should have no connections to any party affected by the work of the inquiry and should not have publicly expressed opinions which could appear to show any bias”.
The time commitment was listed as “at least a further 18 months” from the start of module three and the pay was set at £565 per day – a figure which would total around £175,000 across the period.
The inquiry this week heard further evidence from witnesses at fire engineers Exova and architects Studio E.
A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: "We recognise the importance of ensuring the panel has expertise in community relations and social housing. This is why we are ensuring that the Inquiry has the necessary breadth and diversity of skills required for its work."
Week one: A vivid picture of a broken industry
After a week of damning revelations at the opening of phase two of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, Peter Apps recaps the key points
Week two: What is the significance of the immunity application?
Sir Martin Moore-Bick has written to the attorney general requesting protection for those set to give evidence at the Grenfell Tower Inquiry. Peter Apps explains what the move means
Week three: Architects of misfortune
This week saw the lead architects for the Grenfell Tower refurbishment give evidence to the inquiry. Peter Apps runs through the key points
Week four: ‘I didn’t have any perception that it was the monster it’s become’
The architects continued to give evidence this week, outlining a lack of understanding of the fire risk posed by the cladding materials and its design. Nathaniel Barker reports
Week five: ‘No adverse effect in relation to external fire spread’
As the Grenfell Tower Inquiry returns from its long absence, Peter Apps recaps the key points from a week of important evidence from the fire consultants to the refurbishment
Week six: ‘I can’t recall any instance where I discussed the materials with building control’
Nathaniel Barker summarises what we learned from fire engineers Exova, architects Studio E and the early evidence from contractor Rydon
Week seven: ‘I do not think I have ever worked with a contractor operating with this level of nonchalance’
Two key witnesses from contractor Rydon gave evidence this week. Peter Apps recaps some of the key points from a revealing week of evidence
Week eight: ‘It haunts me that it wasn't challenged’
Four witnesses from contractor Rydon gave evidence this week. Lucie Heath recaps what we learned on the last week of evidence before the inquiry breaks for five weeks
Week nine: ‘All I can say is you will be taken out for a very nice meal very soon’
This week the inquiry heard evidence from witnesses at Harley Facades, the sub-contractor responsible for Grenfell Tower’s cladding. Peter Apps recaps the key points
Week 10: ‘As we all know, ACM will be gone rather quickly in a fire!’
As the Grenfell Tower Inquiry entered its 10th week, Jack Simpson recaps the key points from a week of important evidence from the refurbishment’s cladding contractor
Week 11: ‘Did you get the impression Grenfell Tower was a guinea pig for this insulation?’
With witnesses from the cladding subcontractor, the firm which cut the deadly panels to shape and the clerk of works which inspected the job giving evidence this was week full of revelations. Peter Apps recaps the key points
Week 12: ‘Would you accept that was a serious failing on your part?’
With the surveyor who inspected Grenfell Tower for compliance giving evidence, this was a crucial week from the inquiry. Dominic Brady and Peter Apps report
Week 13: ‘Value for money is to be regarded as the key driver for this project’
With consultants to Kensington & Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO) giving evidence, attention at the Grenfell Tower Inquiry turned for this first time to the actions of the TMO and the council. Peter Apps reports
Week 14: ‘Did it not occur to you at this point that your budget was simply too low?’
This week, for the first time in phase two, the inquiry heard from Kensington & Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation, the landlord that oversaw the fatal refurbishment of Grenfell Tower. Lucie Heath reports
Week 15: ‘Have you ever informed the police that you destroyed documents relevant to their investigation?’
Witnesses from the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO) gave evidence for a second week, which began with a shocking revelation about withheld and destroyed evidence. Pete Apps recaps
Week 16: ‘I conclude this was very serious evidence of professional negligence’
This week saw members of Kensington & Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation finish giving evidence, before the inquiry’s expert witnesses took the stand to make some highly critical assessments of the work they had seen before and during the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower. Jack Simpson recaps
Grenfell Tower: a timeline of the refurbishment
Following the conclusion of module one of the Grenfell Inquiry’s second phase, Peter Apps presents a timeline of the key moments during the fatal refurbishment of the west London tower block.
Week 17: ‘It’s hard to make a note about this because we are not clean’
The start of the second module of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry phase two came with some huge revelations about the companies that sold the products used in the cladding system. Peter Apps reports
Week 18: ‘It was just reckless optimism wasn't it?’
As the inquiry began cross-examining witnesses for the second module of its phase two work, the picture surrounding just how Grenfell Tower ended up wrapped in such dangerous materials became a little clearer. Nathaniel Barker was keeping an eye on proceedings
Week 19: ‘And that was intentional, deliberate, dishonest?’
The Grenfell Tower Inquiry this week heard the shocking story of how the insulation manufacturer "manipulated" official testing and marketed its product "dishonestly". Peter Apps tells the story
Week 20: ‘We were outed by a consultant who we then had to fabricate a story to’
This week the inquiry investigated the actions of Kingspan – the manufacturer of one of the insulation products used in the tower’s cladding system. Dominic Brady reports
Week 21: 'It's there in black and white isn't it? We see a complete absence of any consideration of life safety'
The story of insulation giant Kingspan’s testing and marketing of its combustible insulation for high rises was unpacked in minute detail this week. Peter Apps reports
Week 22: 'All we do is lie in here'
In the third week of evidence from insulation giant Kingspan, the inquiry continued to uncover shocking details about the firm’s behaviour both before and after the Grenfell Tower fire. Lucie Heath reports.
Each week we send out a newsletter rounding up the key news from the Grenfell Inquiry, along with exclusive analysis of what it all means for the social housing sector.
Already have an account? Click here to manage your newsletters